|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
Town of Sparta |
|
PWSID: |
01-03-010 |
| Mailing Address: | 304 S Main St Sparta, NC 28675-9637 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Kevin Dowell | Title: | Planning and Zoning |
| Phone: | 336-372-4257 | Cell/Mobile: | 336-701-7191 |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Kevin Dowell | | Phone: | 336-372-4257 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 99 Sparta, NC 28675 | Cell/Mobile: | 336-701-7191 |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Ductile Iron |
1-12" |
5.00 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
1-12" |
95.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| New River (11-1) | 0 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Alleghany | 0 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
1,032 |
0.1960 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
227 |
0.0370 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
7 |
0.0380 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
3 |
0.0150 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0000 MGD
The Industrial amount is less than normal- Lost Bristol Compressors but Martin Marietta to start up. After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn. The average daily and maximum day use provided in [2-E] only includes water sold and may explain the discrepancy.
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.3250 |
0.0000 |
May |
0.2890 |
0.0000 |
Sep |
0.3110 |
0.0000 |
| Feb |
0.2590 |
0.0000 |
Jun |
0.2940 |
0.0000 |
Oct |
0.2290 |
0.0000 |
| Mar |
0.2790 |
0.0000 |
Jul |
0.3450 |
0.0000 |
Nov |
0.2210 |
0.0000 |
| Apr |
0.3380 |
0.0000 |
Aug |
0.3770 |
0.0000 |
Dec |
0.2140 |
0.0000 |
Maximum day use unavailable. After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn. The average daily and maximum day use provided in [2-E] only includes water sold and may explain the discrepancy. 
Ground Water Sources
| Name or Number |
Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) |
Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
12-Hour Supply (MGD) |
CUA Reduction |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| Well 01 |
0.0550 |
290 |
0.065 |
0.0650 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 02 |
0.0120 |
290 |
0.019 |
0.0190 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 04 |
0.0100 |
290 |
0.029 |
0.0290 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 06 |
0.0260 |
244 |
0.039 |
0.0390 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 07 |
0.0370 |
290 |
0.029 |
0.0290 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 08 |
0.0190 |
290 |
0.026 |
0.0260 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 09 |
0.0110 |
183 |
0.024 |
0.0240 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 10 |
0.0210 |
290 |
0.046 |
0.0460 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 12 |
0.0260 |
290 |
0.031 |
0.0310 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 13 |
0.0300 |
290 |
0.030 |
0.0300 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 14 |
0.0280 |
290 |
0.060 |
0.0600 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 15 |
0.0390 |
290 |
0.079 |
0.0790 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 17 |
0.0730 |
100 |
0.073 |
0.0730 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 18 |
0.0310 |
70 |
0.043 |
0.0430 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 19 |
0.0810 |
70 |
0.043 |
0.0430 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well 20 |
0.0870 |
290 |
0.072 |
0.0720 |
|
|
Regular |
Ground Water Sources (continued)
| Name or Number |
Well Depth (Feet) |
Casing Depth (Feet) |
Screen Depth (Feet) |
Well Diameter (Inches) |
Pump Intake Depth (Feet) |
Metered? |
| Top |
Bottom |
| Well 01 |
575 |
65 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
500 |
Yes |
| Well 02 |
282 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
233 |
Yes |
| Well 04 |
334 |
65 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
300 |
Yes |
| Well 06 |
220 |
105 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
150 |
Yes |
| Well 07 |
398 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
300 |
Yes |
| Well 08 |
305 |
102 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
300 |
Yes |
| Well 09 |
329 |
37 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
305 |
Yes |
| Well 10 |
500 |
55 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
300 |
Yes |
| Well 12 |
273 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
268 |
Yes |
| Well 13 |
307 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
273 |
Yes |
| Well 14 |
605 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
300 |
Yes |
| Well 15 |
645 |
42 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
490 |
Yes |
| Well 17 |
405 |
126 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
295 |
Yes |
| Well 18 |
605 |
77 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
445 |
Yes |
| Well 19 |
525 |
57 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
490 |
Yes |
| Well 20 |
605 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
565 |
Yes |
Maximum daily withdrawal (mgd) based on 12-hr supply, not determined from 2002 well records. Sparta is in the process of developing a well-head protection program. After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn. The average daily and maximum day use provided in [2-E] only includes water sold and may explain the discrepancy.
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.2160 |
May |
0.2190 |
Sep |
0.2260 |
| Feb |
0.2090 |
Jun |
0.2280 |
Oct |
0.1930 |
| Mar |
0.2710 |
Jul |
0.2410 |
Nov |
0.2330 |
| Apr |
0.2230 |
Aug |
0.2250 |
Dec |
0.2250 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0026913 |
|
0.6000 |
0.6000 |
0.2260 |
0.3700 |
Little River |
New River (11-1) |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Year-Round Population |
1,824 |
1,853 |
1,890 |
1,928 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.1960 |
0.2000 |
0.2040 |
0.2080 |
| Commercial |
0.0370 |
0.0380 |
0.0390 |
0.0400 |
| Industrial |
0.0380 |
0.0390 |
0.0400 |
0.0410 |
| Institutional |
0.0150 |
0.0150 |
0.0160 |
0.0160 |
| System Process |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.0676 |
0.0680 |
0.0700 |
0.0710 |
Sparta's population has decreased the past four years. Used conservative growth figures.Used conservative water demand to match the conservative growth. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.7080 |
0.7080 |
0.7080 |
0.7080 |
| Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
0.7080 |
0.7080 |
0.7080 |
0.7080 |
| Service Area Demand |
0.3536 |
0.3600 |
0.3690 |
0.3760 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
0.3536 |
0.3600 |
0.3690 |
0.3760 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
50% |
51% |
52% |
53% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 107 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Sparta has joined with Grayson County and Indepence Virginia and Alleghany County to form a regional water authority to develop future water supply for the area. Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|