The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
Water System Name: |
Broad River Water Authority |
|
PWSID: |
01-81-035 |
Mailing Address: | PO Box 1269 Rutherfordton, NC 28139 | Ownership: | Authority |
|
Contact Person: | Maria Hunnicutt | Title: | Executive Director |
Phone: | 828-286-0640 | Cell/Mobile: | 828-429-8633 |
Distribution System
Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
Cast Iron |
4-16 |
1.36 % |
Ductile Iron |
4-24 |
68.40 % |
Galvanized Iron |
2 |
0.18 % |
Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-10 |
30.06 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
Broad River (01-1) | 100 % |
|
County(s) | % of Service Population |
Rutherford | 100 % |
|
Water Use by Type
Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
Residential |
6,956 |
0.8240 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Commercial |
375 |
0.1540 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Industrial |
17 |
0.2020 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
119 |
0.1090 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0500 MGD
Water Sales
Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Cleveland County Sanitary District |
01-23-055 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
6 |
Emergency |
Grassy Pond WC in South Carolina |
11-20-002 |
1.0310 |
341 |
2.1600 |
2039 |
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
Polk County Water System |
10-75-010 |
4.1700 |
365 |
6.1000 |
2029 |
Yes |
Yes |
20 |
Regular |
Town of Forest City |
01-81-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
4.5000 |
2026 |
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Emergency |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
Jan |
6.3800 |
8.5020 |
May |
6.6950 |
7.9290 |
Sep |
6.8450 |
8.7240 |
Feb |
6.0760 |
7.4870 |
Jun |
7.7170 |
10.0890 |
Oct |
6.9470 |
9.3910 |
Mar |
5.9250 |
7.2480 |
Jul |
7.7370 |
9.5670 |
Nov |
6.5100 |
8.1580 |
Apr |
6.6020 |
8.5520 |
Aug |
7.3030 |
9.1890 |
Dec |
6.2920 |
7.7700 |

Surface Water Sources
Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
Broad River |
|
6.7520 |
365 |
10.0890 |
13.0000 |
F |
0.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
Broad River |
|
255 |
Yes |
Broad River (01-1) |
Rutherford |
|
Regular |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Town of Forest City |
01-81-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
3.4000 |
2026 |
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Emergency |
Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
Broad River Water Plant |
12.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Broad River |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Jan |
0.0000 |
May |
0.0000 |
Sep |
0.0000 |
Feb |
0.0000 |
Jun |
0.0000 |
Oct |
0.0000 |
Mar |
0.0000 |
Jul |
0.0000 |
Nov |
0.0000 |
Apr |
0.0000 |
Aug |
0.0000 |
Dec |
0.0000 |

5. Planning
Projections
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Year-Round Population |
17,390 |
19,300 |
22,950 |
27,300 |
32,450 |
38,600 |
Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Residential |
0.8240 |
0.9071 |
1.0787 |
1.2831 |
1.5252 |
1.8142 |
Commercial |
0.1540 |
0.1450 |
0.1310 |
0.1190 |
0.1070 |
0.0970 |
Industrial |
0.2020 |
0.2140 |
0.2170 |
0.2200 |
0.2210 |
0.2210 |
Institutional |
0.1090 |
0.1090 |
0.1090 |
0.1100 |
0.1100 |
0.1100 |
System Process |
0.0500 |
0.1300 |
0.1560 |
0.1872 |
0.2200 |
0.2400 |
Unaccounted-for |
0.2754 |
0.1750 |
0.1920 |
0.2100 |
0.2290 |
0.2490 |
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Surface Water Supply |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Available Supply (MGD) |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
Service Area Demand |
1.6144 |
1.6801 |
1.8837 |
2.1293 |
2.4122 |
2.7312 |
Sales |
5.1192 |
8.2600 |
8.2600 |
8.2600 |
8.2600 |
8.2600 |
Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Demand (MGD) |
6.7336 |
9.9401 |
10.1437 |
10.3893 |
10.6722 |
10.9912 |
Demand as Percent of Supply |
52% |
76% |
78% |
80% |
82% |
85% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 47 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
No changes
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? Our demand as a percent of supply appears high due to the model utilizing the maximum contractual amount in our sales agreements. Our projections for actual sales through contracts will remain similar to current sales for the foreseeable future. Another consideration is that our sales to Polk (then to Inman Campobello Water District) could decrease given that ICWD is building their own WTP on the N Pacolet River.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? BRWA along with Polk County and Inman Campobello Water District are currently working with an engineering firm to locate suitable property in Rutherford and/or Polk Counties along the Green River for a future potential raw water intake. This study should be complete in 2026. Plans are to jointly purchase property over the next 5 years.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? Master Plan was completed in 2023. It evaluated major projects included in our CIP which were determined by our Asset Management Plan. PER studies for the WTP and the Poors Ford Pump Station were both completed in 2024. Engineering design to be complete at end of FY 2025 focuses on 3 phases (1- firm capacity/ redundancy at 12 MGD, 2- increased capacity to full withdraw of 13 MGD, and 3 - increased capacity to 18 MGD with additional raw water source). $2.3 million budgeted in FY 25 for design alone. Probable Costs for phase 1 (firm capacity/ redundancy at 12 MGD) is $15 million with contingency. BRWA would need to borrow funds if this project happens within the next 5 years.
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: BRWA has no identified deficiencies or needed improvements at this time. BRWA is investigating long term improvements to the WTP and the Poors Ford pump station that could exceed $15 M to improve the efficiency and redundancy of the system.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|