The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
Water System Name: |
Louisburg |
|
PWSID: |
02-35-015 |
Mailing Address: | 110 West Nash St. Louisburg, NC 27549 | Ownership: | Municipality |
|
Contact Person: | Ray Proctor | Title: | Water Plant Superintendent |
Phone: | 919-496-3433 | Cell/Mobile: | 252-343-4758 |
|
Secondary Contact: | Jesse W. Horne | | Phone: | 828-405-0193 |
Mailing Address: | 110 West Nash Street Louisburg, NC 27549 | Cell/Mobile: | 252-341-0261 |
Distribution System
Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
Asbestos Cement |
8 |
4.00 % |
Cast Iron |
6-12 |
22.00 % |
Ductile Iron |
4-16 |
47.00 % |
Galvanized Iron |
1-2 |
1.00 % |
Polyvinyl Chloride |
6-12 |
26.00 % |
The new lines were all 8 inch and place in the Green Hill Subdivision. Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
Tar River (15-1) | 100 % |
|
County(s) | % of Service Population |
Franklin | 100 % |
|
Population information was from Worldpopulationreview.com
Water Use by Type
Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
Residential |
1,358 |
0.1250 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Commercial |
359 |
0.2020 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Industrial |
7 |
0.0120 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
10 |
0.0020 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0530 MGD
Water Sales
Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Franklin County Public Utilities |
02-35-030 |
0.4880 |
365 |
0.5000 |
2025 |
Yes |
No |
16 |
Regular |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
Jan |
0.9570 |
1.2000 |
May |
1.1310 |
1.4490 |
Sep |
0.9470 |
1.2810 |
Feb |
0.9400 |
1.1600 |
Jun |
1.2810 |
1.6590 |
Oct |
0.9260 |
1.1550 |
Mar |
0.8830 |
1.2330 |
Jul |
1.1740 |
1.4700 |
Nov |
0.8970 |
1.2000 |
Apr |
1.0500 |
1.3860 |
Aug |
1.1280 |
1.5330 |
Dec |
0.8690 |
1.0920 |

Surface Water Sources
Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
Tar River |
|
1.0180 |
365 |
1.5659 |
3.0000 |
F |
0.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
Tar River |
|
426 |
Yes |
Tar River (15-1) |
Franklin |
|
Regular |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Franklin County Public Utilities |
02-35-030 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
|
No |
No |
16 |
Regular |
Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
Louisburg |
2.0000 |
Yes |
No |
Tar River |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Jan |
0.7287 |
May |
0.5623 |
Sep |
0.6607 |
Feb |
0.4893 |
Jun |
0.4733 |
Oct |
0.5371 |
Mar |
0.5939 |
Jul |
0.6265 |
Nov |
0.5133 |
Apr |
0.5097 |
Aug |
0.8265 |
Dec |
0.4855 |

Wastewater Permits
Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
NC0020231 |
WWTP |
1.3700 |
1.5000 |
0.5865 |
2.7000 |
Tar River |
Tar River (15-1) |
WQ0005981 |
WWTP |
1.3700 |
1.5000 |
0.0083 |
0.0840 |
Land Application |
Tar River (15-1) |
5. Planning
Projections
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Year-Round Population |
3,404 |
3,554 |
3,710 |
3,873 |
4,044 |
4,222 |
Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Residential |
0.1250 |
0.1310 |
0.1360 |
0.1420 |
0.1480 |
0.1540 |
Commercial |
0.2020 |
0.2110 |
0.2200 |
0.2300 |
0.2400 |
0.2510 |
Industrial |
0.0120 |
0.0130 |
0.0140 |
0.0150 |
0.0160 |
0.0170 |
Institutional |
0.0020 |
0.0030 |
0.0040 |
0.0040 |
0.0050 |
0.0060 |
System Process |
0.0530 |
0.0550 |
0.0580 |
0.0600 |
0.0630 |
0.0660 |
Unaccounted-for |
0.1345 |
0.1140 |
0.1180 |
0.1240 |
0.1290 |
0.1350 |
Using 4.4% growth which is the last 100 years average for population growth. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Surface Water Supply |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Available Supply (MGD) |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
Service Area Demand |
0.5285 |
0.5270 |
0.5500 |
0.5750 |
0.6010 |
0.6290 |
Sales |
0.4867 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Demand (MGD) |
1.0152 |
1.0270 |
1.0500 |
1.0750 |
1.1010 |
1.1290 |
Demand as Percent of Supply |
34% |
34% |
35% |
36% |
37% |
38% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 37 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
No Changes
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? No Change
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? No Change
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? No Change
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning? For the preparation of the LWSP we used both internet historical data of population in Louisburg along with several Departments contribution of their historical records to fulfill the obligations of information required for the LWSP.
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: The town is aware of the original 1910 abandoned Clear-well that was taken out of commission in 1996-98 due to severe leakage and was recommended to be demolished and replace with a new Clear-well within the next 5-10 years. Also, at the river there is a large amount of sand infiltration that has to be manually cleaned and pumped out monthly; therefore, a possible screening system to help prevent sand infiltration into the Raw Water Pump Wells will likely be looked into and installed within the next 5-10 as well.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|