Roxboro

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.

1. System Information

Contact Information

Complete

Water System Name: Roxboro   PWSID: 02-73-010
Mailing Address:P. O. Box 128
Roxboro, NC 27573		Ownership:Municipality
 
Contact Person:Sammy YarboroTitle:Water Plant Superintendent
Phone:336-599-4906Cell/Mobile:336-459-9331
 
Secondary Contact:Brooks Lockhart Phone:336-322-6010
Mailing Address:PO Box 128
Roxboro, NC 27573		Cell/Mobile:336-459-9331
Distribution System
Line Type Size Range (Inches) Estimated % of lines
Cast Iron 4-12 33.00 %
Ductile Iron 6-16 50.00 %
Galvanized Iron 1-2 6.00 %
Polyvinyl Chloride 2-12 11.00 %
What are the estimated total miles of distribution system lines?   100 Miles
How many feet of distribution lines were replaced during 2002?   5,000 Feet
How many feet of new water mains were added during 2002?   59,775 Feet
How many meters were replaced in 2002?   250
How old are the oldest meters in this system?   20 Year(s)
How many meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, are not billed for sewer services?   47
What is this system's finished water storage capacity?   5.0000 Million Gallons
Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system since last update? Line breaks that were repaired quickly should not be included.   No
Programs
Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants?   Yes, 12 Months or more
Does this system have a valve exercise program?   No, None
Does this system have a cross-connection program?   Yes
Does this system have a program to replace meters?   Yes
Does this system have a plumbing retrofit program?   Yes
Does this system have an active water conservation public education program?   No
Does this system have a leak detection program?   Yes
Water Conservation
What type of rate structure is used?   Decreasing
How much reclaimed water does this system use?   0.0000 MGD   For how many connections?   0
Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an emergency?   No

2. Water Use Information

Service Area
Sub-Basin(s)% of Service Population
Roanoke River (14-1)0 %
Neuse River (10-1)0 %
County(s)% of Service Population
Person0 %
What was the year-round population served in 2002?   11,208
Has this system acquired another system since last report?   
Water Use by Type
Type of Use Metered
Connections		 Metered
Average Use (MGD)		 Non-Metered
Connections		 Non-Metered
Estimated Use (MGD)
Residential 3,823 0.6600 0 0.0000
Commercial 653 0.4580 0 0.0000
Industrial 15 1.1050 0 0.0000
Institutional 10 0.0940 4 0.0100

How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)?   0.2600 MGD

Note: #6 (37.262 MG Distribution waste+ 57.911 MG Water Plant Waste)/365

3. Water Supply Sources

Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)		 Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)		 Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)
Jan 2.6810 3.4500 May 2.8840 4.1800 Sep 3.4110 4.1500
Feb 2.6140 3.2600 Jun 3.3410 3.9900 Oct 2.9250 4.2000
Mar 2.4760 3.2700 Jul 3.3550 4.1400 Nov 2.6060 3.3000
Apr 2.6810 3.4500 Aug 3.5010 4.1100 Dec 2.8950 4.1400

Surface Water Sources
Stream Reservoir Average Daily Withdrawal Maximum Day
Withdrawal (MGD)		 Available Raw
Water Supply		 Usable On-Stream
Raw Water Supply
Storage (MG)
MGD Days Used MGD * Qualifier
S. Hyco Creek Lake Roxboro 6.8000 117 7.0000 7.8000 SY20 2,850.0000
Stories and Satterfield Creeks Lake Issac Walton (City Lake) 2.9500 365 4.2000 3.2000 SY20 750.0000

* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit

Surface Water Sources (continued)
Stream Reservoir Drainage Area
(sq mi)		 Metered? Sub-Basin County Year
Offline		 Use
Type
S. Hyco Creek Lake Roxboro 23 Yes Roanoke River (14-1) Person Regular
Stories and Satterfield Creeks Lake Issac Walton (City Lake) 10 Yes Roanoke River (14-1) Person Regular
What is this system's off-stream raw water supply storage capacity?   0 Million gallons
Are surface water sources monitored?   ,
Are you required to maintain minimum flows downstream of its intake or dam?   No
Does this system anticipate transferring surface water between river basins?   No

Water withdrawn from Lake Roxboro is sent downstream and transferred into Lake Isaac Walton. The intake at Lake Isaac Walton is used to withdraw water for treatment and use by the system. The average daily withdrawal from Lake Roxboro should not be added when determining the total water use by the system(i.e. Total Water Use = 2.95 mgd).

Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name Permitted Capacity
(MGD)		 Is Raw Water Metered? Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? Source
Roxboro WTP 8.0000 Yes Yes Lake Issac Walton and Lake Roxboro
Did average daily water production exceed 80% of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2002?  No
     If yes, was any water conservation implemented?  
Did average daily water production exceed 90% of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2002?  No
     If yes, was any water conservation implemented?  
Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity in the next 10 years?  No

4. Wastewater Information

Monthly Discharges
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)		 Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)		 Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Jan 2.5530 May 2.2020 Sep 2.3660
Feb 2.3140 Jun 2.0760 Oct 2.8010
Mar 2.4230 Jul 2.0280 Nov 2.9870
Apr 2.2680 Aug 2.2030 Dec 3.2160

How many sewer connections does this system have?   3,487
How many water service connections with septic systems does this system have?   1,004
Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years?   No
Wastewater Permits
Permit Number Type Permitted Capacity
(MGD)		 Design Capacity
(MGD)		 Average Annual
Daily Discharge
(MGD)		 Maximum Day Discharge
(MGD)		 Receiving Stream Receiving Basin
NC0003042 0.0000 0.0000 0.1580 0.8580 Marlowe Creek Roanoke River (14-1)
NC0021024 5.0000 5.0000 2.3000 5.2700 Marlowe Creek Roanoke River (14-1)

5. Planning

Projections
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Year-Round Population 11,208 11,387 11,570 11,755
Seasonal Population 0 0 0 0
 
Residential 0.6600 0.6710 0.6810 0.6920
Commercial 0.4580 0.4650 0.4730 0.4800
Industrial 1.1050 1.1230 1.1410 1.1590
Institutional 0.1040 0.1060 0.1070 0.1090
System Process 0.2600 0.2640 0.2680 0.2730
Unaccounted-for 2.5427 0.3690 0.3750 0.3810
Future Supply Sources
Source Name PWSID Source Type Additional Supply Year Online Year Offline Type
Dan River 02-73-101 Surface 23.0000 Regular

Roxboro and Person Co have entered into a Regional Agreement with Yanceyville for a requested withdrawal from the Dan River. Total Request is 30 MGD (Roxboro and Person Co 23 MGD, Yanceyville 7 MGD) and no projected on-line date has been established as of this time.

Demand v/s Percent of Supply
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Surface Water Supply 11.0000 11.0000 11.0000 11.0000
Ground Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Purchases 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Supplies 23.0000 23.0000 23.0000
Total Available Supply (MGD) 11.0000 34.0000 34.0000 34.0000
Service Area Demand 5.1297 2.9980 3.0450 3.0940
Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Demand (MGD) 5.1297 2.9980 3.0450 3.0940
Demand as Percent of Supply 47% 9% 9% 9%

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.

Your long-term water demand is 59 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.    

Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?   

What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?   

How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?   

Additional Information

Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning?  Yes

What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?  Comprehensive Water Plan, Person County and The City of Roxboro, 1998

Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:   Roxboro's water system is long and narrow. Investigations into the meeting of the Phase II By-Products Rules have begun.

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.