Eden

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.

1. System Information

Contact Information

Incomplete

Water System Name: Eden   PWSID: 02-79-010
Mailing Address:191 Mebane Bridge Road
Eden, NC 27288
Ownership:Municipality
 
Contact Person:Chris PowellTitle:Water and Wastewater Superintendent
Phone:336-627-1009Cell/Mobile:336-430-2235
Distribution System
Line Type Size Range (Inches) Estimated % of lines
Asbestos Cement 10 10.00 %
Cast Iron 12 7.00 %
Ductile Iron 30 59.00 %
Galvanized Iron 3 14.00 %
Other 2 0.00 %
Polyvinyl Chloride 8 10.00 %
What are the estimated total miles of distribution system lines?   165 Miles
How many feet of distribution lines were replaced during 2002?   1,354 Feet
How many feet of new water mains were added during 2002?   2,200 Feet
How many meters were replaced in 2002?   125
How old are the oldest meters in this system?   40 Year(s)
How many meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, are not billed for sewer services?   35
What is this system's finished water storage capacity?   9.5750 Million Gallons
Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system since last update? Line breaks that were repaired quickly should not be included.   No
Programs
Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants?   No, None
Does this system have a valve exercise program?   No, None
Does this system have a cross-connection program?   No
Does this system have a program to replace meters?   Yes
Does this system have a plumbing retrofit program?   No
Does this system have an active water conservation public education program?   No
Does this system have a leak detection program?   Yes
Water Conservation
What type of rate structure is used?   Flat
How much reclaimed water does this system use?   0.0000 MGD   For how many connections?   0
Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an emergency?   No

2. Water Use Information

Service Area
Sub-Basin(s)% of Service Population
Roanoke River (14-1)0 %
County(s)% of Service Population
Rockingham0 %
What was the year-round population served in 2002?   15,898
Has this system acquired another system since last report?   
Water Use by Type
Type of Use Metered
Connections
Metered
Average Use (MGD)
Non-Metered
Connections
Non-Metered
Estimated Use (MGD)
Residential 6,712 1.0530 0 0.0000
Commercial 513 0.4410 0 0.0000
Industrial 56 6.2510 0 0.0000
Institutional 148 0.1820 0 0.0000

How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)?   0.6600 MGD

Water Sales
Purchaser PWSID Average
Daily Sold
(MGD)
Days
Used
Contract Required to
comply with water
use restrictions?
Pipe Size(s)
(Inches)
Use
Type
MGD Expiration Recurring
Dan River Water. Inc. 02-79-040 0.8840 365 1.6700 2029 6 &16 Regular
Henry County, VA, PSA 05-89-716 0.0180 365 0.0400 8 Regular

Water sale contracts with Dan River Water, Inc. expires 2029. The contract is assumed to be renewed.

3. Water Supply Sources

Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
Average Daily
Use (MGD)
Max Day
Use (MGD)
Average Daily
Use (MGD)
Max Day
Use (MGD)
Average Daily
Use (MGD)
Max Day
Use (MGD)
Jan 10.0860 12.3210 May 10.7960 12.2870 Sep 10.8700 12.9300
Feb 9.9390 11.4150 Jun 11.7060 14.2190 Oct 10.7810 13.8160
Mar 10.0470 13.8520 Jul 11.2350 13.4810 Nov 9.5790 12.1380
Apr 10.6780 12.3200 Aug 11.5890 13.9340 Dec 9.0150 11.7820

Average and maximum use are for the year 2002.

Surface Water Sources
Stream Reservoir Average Daily Withdrawal Maximum Day
Withdrawal (MGD)
Available Raw
Water Supply
Usable On-Stream
Raw Water Supply
Storage (MG)
MGD Days Used MGD * Qualifier
Dan River 10.5270 365 14.2190 24.1700 F 0.0000

* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit

Surface Water Sources (continued)
Stream Reservoir Drainage Area
(sq mi)
Metered? Sub-Basin County Year
Offline
Use
Type
Dan River 1,150 No Roanoke River (14-1) Rockingham Regular
What is this system's off-stream raw water supply storage capacity?   88 Million gallons
Are surface water sources monitored?   ,
Are you required to maintain minimum flows downstream of its intake or dam?   No
Does this system anticipate transferring surface water between river basins?   No
Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name Permitted Capacity
(MGD)
Is Raw Water Metered? Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? Source
Eden WTP 20.6000 No Yes Dan River
Did average daily water production exceed 80% of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2002?  No
     If yes, was any water conservation implemented?  
Did average daily water production exceed 90% of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2002?  No
     If yes, was any water conservation implemented?  
Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity in the next 10 years?  No

4. Wastewater Information

Monthly Discharges
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Jan 7.4120 May 7.6530 Sep 7.2980
Feb 7.2210 Jun 7.1280 Oct 8.9270
Mar 8.1510 Jul 6.4190 Nov 9.1160
Apr 7.2490 Aug 6.9340 Dec 9.7020

How many sewer connections does this system have?   7,382
How many water service connections with septic systems does this system have?   47
Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years?   No
Wastewater Permits
Permit Number Type Permitted Capacity
(MGD)
Design Capacity
(MGD)
Average Annual
Daily Discharge
(MGD)
Maximum Day Discharge
(MGD)
Receiving Stream Receiving Basin
NC0025071 13.5000 13.5000 7.5610 17.5780 Dan River Roanoke River (14-1)
NC025151 0.5000 0.5000 0.2070 3.5140 Dan River Roanoke River (14-1)

5. Planning

Projections
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Year-Round Population 15,898 16,988 17,996 19,064
Seasonal Population 0 0 0 0
 
Residential 1.0530 2.0480 2.1760 2.3040
Commercial 0.4410 0.8320 0.8840 0.9360
Industrial 6.2510 10.0000 14.0000 18.0000
Institutional 0.1820 0.3200 0.3400 0.3600
System Process 0.6600 0.6990 0.7410 0.7860
Unaccounted-for 1.0380 1.0710 1.1030 1.1360

Population Growth through 2020 based on WK Dickson Water/Sewer Master Plan May 2003. Beyond 2020, the growth is based on the trending up to 2020.

Future Water Sales
Purchaser PWSID Contract Pipe Size(s) (Inches) Use Type
MGD Year Begin Year End
Dan River Water, Inc. 02-79-040 1.6700 2029 6 &16 Regular

It is anticipated that Dan River Water would need a supplier to meet customer demand to continue supplying water past the contractual period.

Future Supply Sources
Source Name PWSID Source Type Additional Supply Year Online Year Offline Type
Mebane Bridge Raw Water Intake 02-79-010 Surface 17.8300 2009 Regular

A new 42 MGD intake and pump station is planned to replace the existing raw water intake. The larger intake will provide an additional 17.83 MGD raw water supply capacity per day.

Demand v/s Percent of Supply
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Surface Water Supply 24.1700 24.1700 24.1700 24.1700
Ground Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Purchases 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Supplies 17.8300 17.8300 17.8300
Total Available Supply (MGD) 24.1700 42.0000 42.0000 42.0000
Service Area Demand 9.6250 14.9700 19.2440 23.5220
Sales 0.9020 1.7100 1.7100 0.0400
Future Sales 0.0000 0.0000 1.6700
Total Demand (MGD) 10.5270 16.6800 20.9540 25.2320
Demand as Percent of Supply 44% 40% 50% 60%

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.

Your long-term water demand is 66 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.    

Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?   

What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?   

How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?   

Additional Information

Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning?  Yes

What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?  WK Dickson Comphrensive Water and Wastewater Master Plan May 2003

Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:   A 42 MGD Raw Water Pump Station is being planned for the replacement of the existing pump station.

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.