Stoneville

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.

1. System Information

Contact Information

Incomplete

Water System Name: Stoneville   PWSID: 02-79-035
Mailing Address:P.O. Box 71
Stoneville, NC 27048		Ownership:Municipality
 
Contact Person:Bryon CurryTitle:ORC
Phone:336-573-9393Cell/Mobile:--
 
Secondary Contact:Bobby Cavenaugh/NCRWA Phone:336-780-0707
Mailing Address:
, NC 		Cell/Mobile:--
Distribution System
Line Type Size Range (Inches) Estimated % of lines
Cast Iron 6-8 10.00 %
Ductile Iron 6-8 50.00 %
Galvanized Iron 1 10.00 %
Polyvinyl Chloride 2-6 30.00 %
What are the estimated total miles of distribution system lines?   20 Miles
How many feet of distribution lines were replaced during 2002?   3,520 Feet
How many feet of new water mains were added during 2002?   6,336 Feet
How many meters were replaced in 2002?   30
How old are the oldest meters in this system?   20 Year(s)
How many meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, are not billed for sewer services?   0
What is this system's finished water storage capacity?   0.0000 Million Gallons
Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system since last update? Line breaks that were repaired quickly should not be included.   No

Stoneville replaced some of the water lines on Bryan St in 2002.

Programs
Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants?   Yes, 2-6 Months
Does this system have a valve exercise program?   No, None
Does this system have a cross-connection program?   Yes
Does this system have a program to replace meters?   Yes
Does this system have a plumbing retrofit program?   No
Does this system have an active water conservation public education program?   No
Does this system have a leak detection program?   Yes
Water Conservation
What type of rate structure is used?   Increasing
How much reclaimed water does this system use?   0.0000 MGD   For how many connections?   0
Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an emergency?   Yes

2. Water Use Information

Service Area
Sub-Basin(s)% of Service Population
Roanoke River (14-1)0 %
County(s)% of Service Population
Rockingham0 %
What was the year-round population served in 2002?   995
Has this system acquired another system since last report?   
Water Use by Type
Type of Use Metered
Connections		 Metered
Average Use (MGD)		 Non-Metered
Connections		 Non-Metered
Estimated Use (MGD)
Residential 479 0.1270 0 0.0000
Commercial 79 0.0020 0 0.0000
Industrial 5 0.0020 0 0.0000
Institutional 23 0.0010 0 0.0000

How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)?   0.0000 MGD

Residential average use = 0.1269 mgd, Commercial average use = 0.00189 mgd, Industrial average use = 0.001735 mgd, Institutional average use = 0.0006 mgd. Negative unaccounted-for water due to rounding.

3. Water Supply Sources

Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)		 Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)		 Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)
Jan 0.1210 0.1820 May 0.1400 0.1620 Sep 0.1260 0.1600
Feb 0.1110 0.1450 Jun 0.1380 0.1690 Oct 0.1510 0.2960
Mar 0.1360 0.6490 Jul 0.1240 0.1520 Nov 0.1250 0.1760
Apr 0.1250 0.1600 Aug 0.1340 0.1820 Dec 0.1580 0.2150

Figures taken from monthly usage reports, which are sent to DEH-PWSS.

Water Purchases From Other Systems
Seller PWSID Average
Daily Purchased
(MGD)		 Days
Used		 Contract Required to
comply with water
use restrictions?		 Pipe Size(s)
(Inches)		 Use
Type
MGD Expiration Recurring
Mayodan 02-79-025 0.1300 365 1.0080 8 Regular

Information taken from contract. Purchase contract expiration year with Mayodan is 2007 and is assumed to continue thereafter.

4. Wastewater Information

Monthly Discharges
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)		 Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)		 Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Jan 0.1820 May 0.1390 Sep 0.1600
Feb 0.1440 Jun 0.1450 Oct 0.2140
Mar 0.1920 Jul 0.1560 Nov 0.2290
Apr 0.1490 Aug 0.1720 Dec 0.2150

How many sewer connections does this system have?   478
How many water service connections with septic systems does this system have?   71
Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years?   Yes

Info taken from monthly reports

Wastewater Permits
Permit Number Type Permitted Capacity
(MGD)		 Design Capacity
(MGD)		 Average Annual
Daily Discharge
(MGD)		 Maximum Day Discharge
(MGD)		 Receiving Stream Receiving Basin
NC0028011 0.2500 0.2500 0.1750 0.0000 Mayo River Roanoke River (14-1)

5. Planning

Projections
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Year-Round Population 995 1,200 1,300 1,400
Seasonal Population 0 0 0 0
 
Residential 0.1270 0.1400 0.1550 0.1700
Commercial 0.0020 0.0090 0.0100 0.0110
Industrial 0.0020 0.0140 0.0150 0.0160
Institutional 0.0010 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060
System Process 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unaccounted-for -0.002 0.0150 0.0160 0.0180

Stoneville does not have any seasonal water demands. Population projections estimated from 1997 LWSP. Unaccounted-for water was taken from 2002 audit. Demand projections based on 1997 LWSP. Residential projections assumed to be 10%. Unaccounted-for water estimated to be 10% of total projected use.

Demand v/s Percent of Supply
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Surface Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Ground Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Purchases 1.0080 1.0080 1.0080 1.0080
Future Supplies 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Available Supply (MGD) 1.0080 1.0080 1.0080 1.0080
Service Area Demand 0.1300 0.1840 0.2020 0.2210
Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Demand (MGD) 0.1300 0.1840 0.2020 0.2210
Demand as Percent of Supply 13% 18% 20% 22%

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.

Your long-term water demand is 128 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.    

Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?   

What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?   

How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?   

Additional Information

Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning?  No

What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?  Only plan is to continue to buy water from Mayodan.

Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:   None

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.