The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Provisional
Water System Name: |
Pittsboro |
|
PWSID: |
03-19-015 |
Mailing Address: | PO Box 3729 Sanford, NC 27331 | Ownership: | Municipality |
|
Contact Person: | Victor Czar | Title: | Assistant City Manager |
Phone: | 919-777-1118 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
|
Secondary Contact: | Paul Weeks | | Phone: | 919-777-1119 |
Mailing Address: | PO Box 3729 Sanford, NC 27331 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
Asbestos Cement |
6-10 |
0.10 % |
Cast Iron |
6-8 |
8.70 % |
Ductile Iron |
6-16 |
35.10 % |
Galvanized Iron |
2 |
6.80 % |
Other |
2-8 |
26.60 % |
Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-12 |
22.70 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
Long term options for interconnectivity are being investigated in collaboration with the Western Intake Partners treatment facility, currently in design, and infrastructure connections from the recent merger with the City of Sanford.
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
Haw River (02-1) | 100 % |
|
County(s) | % of Service Population |
Chatham | 100 % |
|
Water Use by Type
Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
Residential |
2,441 |
0.2670 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Commercial |
473 |
0.2150 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
3 |
0.0100 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.1298 MGD
System Process Water = 0.1191 (NPDES discharge at the WTP) + 0.0107 (flushing) = 0.1298 MGD Water Sales
Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Chapel Ridge S/D |
40-19-009 |
0.1282 |
365 |
0.0000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
Jan |
0.9460 |
1.5000 |
May |
1.1370 |
1.4290 |
Sep |
1.0400 |
1.3600 |
Feb |
0.9730 |
1.2000 |
Jun |
1.3000 |
1.5390 |
Oct |
1.1100 |
1.2900 |
Mar |
0.9690 |
1.2200 |
Jul |
1.2400 |
1.4300 |
Nov |
1.1100 |
1.3800 |
Apr |
1.0900 |
1.3180 |
Aug |
1.1460 |
1.4020 |
Dec |
1.0900 |
1.4020 |

Surface Water Sources
Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
Haw River |
|
1.0960 |
365 |
0.0000 |
2.0000 |
T |
0.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
Haw River |
|
1,275 |
Yes |
Haw River (02-1) |
Chatham |
|
Regular |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Chatham County |
03-19-126 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.5000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
8 |
Emergency |
Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
Town of Pittsboro WTP |
2.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Haw River |
Long term options for interconnectivity are being investigated in collaboration with the Western Intake Partners treatment facility, currently in design, and infrastructure connections from the recent merger with the City of Sanford.
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Jan |
0.7710 |
May |
0.6380 |
Sep |
0.8290 |
Feb |
0.6180 |
Jun |
0.5040 |
Oct |
0.6130 |
Mar |
0.7420 |
Jul |
0.6560 |
Nov |
0.5720 |
Apr |
0.6190 |
Aug |
0.7670 |
Dec |
0.5860 |

Wastewater Permits
Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
NC0020354 |
WWTP |
3.2200 |
0.7500 |
0.5742 |
|
Roberson Creek |
Haw River (02-1) |
NC0080896 |
WTP |
0.0000 |
0.2880 |
0.1191 |
|
Haw River |
Haw River (02-1) |
WQ00200109 |
WWTP |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0038 |
|
Various - sludge |
Haw River (02-1) |
5. Planning
Projections
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Year-Round Population |
6,493 |
20,609 |
51,522 |
61,826 |
74,191 |
85,150 |
Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Residential |
0.2670 |
1.0000 |
2.5000 |
3.2000 |
4.0000 |
4.5000 |
Commercial |
0.2150 |
0.2700 |
0.3000 |
0.9000 |
1.5500 |
2.1000 |
Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
0.0100 |
0.0390 |
0.0450 |
0.0500 |
0.0600 |
0.0700 |
System Process |
0.1298 |
0.6000 |
0.1000 |
0.2000 |
0.3000 |
0.4000 |
Unaccounted-for |
0.3434 |
0.1500 |
0.4077 |
0.5862 |
0.7851 |
0.9950 |
Future Supply Sources
Source Name |
PWSID |
Source Type |
Additional Supply |
Year Online |
Year Offline |
Type |
Sanford |
03-53-010 |
Surface |
2.0000 |
2027 |
2031 |
Regular |
Sanford |
03-53-010 |
Surface |
2.0000 |
2031 |
|
Regular |
Western Intake Partnership |
03-32-010 |
Surface |
1.0000 |
2031 |
2045 |
Regular |
Western Intake Partnership |
03-32-010 |
Surface |
4.0000 |
2045 |
|
Regular |
While the Western Intake Partnership water treatment facility is moving forward, there has not yet been a PWSID assigned. To show the future supply planning, that facility has been included in this section using the existing City of Durham PWSID. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Surface Water Supply |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Future Supplies |
2.0000 |
3.0000 |
6.0000 |
6.0000 |
6.0000 |
Total Available Supply (MGD) |
2.0000 |
4.0000 |
5.0000 |
8.0000 |
8.0000 |
8.0000 |
Service Area Demand |
0.9652 |
2.0590 |
3.3527 |
4.9362 |
6.6951 |
8.0650 |
Sales |
0.1278 |
0.1282 |
0.1282 |
0.1282 |
0.1282 |
0.1282 |
Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Demand (MGD) |
1.0930 |
2.1872 |
3.4809 |
5.0644 |
6.8233 |
8.1932 |
Demand as Percent of Supply |
55% |
55% |
70% |
63% |
85% |
102% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 41 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
The Town of Pittsboro merged utilities with the City of Sanford on July 1, 2024. Sanford's planning efforts and utility management should adequately address the capacity and management issues faced in the future.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? The Town of Pittsboro merged utilities with the City of Sanford on July 1, 2024. Sanford's planning efforts and utility management should adequately address the capacity and management issues faced in the future.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? The Town of Pittsboro merged utilities with the City of Sanford on July 1, 2024. Sanford's planning efforts and utility management should adequately address the capacity and management issues faced in the future.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? The Town of Pittsboro merged utilities with the City of Sanford on July 1, 2024. Sanford's planning efforts and utility management should adequately address the capacity and management issues faced in the future.
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? Yes, The Town of Pittsboro merged utilities with the City of Sanford on July 1, 2024. Sanford's planning efforts and utility management should adequately address the capacity and management issues faced in the future.
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|