|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
Chatham Co (East) |
|
PWSID: |
03-19-045 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 1550 Pittsboro, NC 27312 | Ownership: | County |
| |
| Contact Person: | Stephen Talbert | Title: | Public Works Director |
| Phone: | 919-542-8254 | Cell/Mobile: | |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Ductile Iron |
8-12 |
5.00 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-12 |
95.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Cape Fear River (02-3) | 0 % |
| Deep River (02-2) | 0 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Chatham | 0 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
334 |
0.0410 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
27 |
0.0080 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
10 |
0.0800 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0150 MGD
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.1120 |
0.0000 |
May |
0.1740 |
0.0000 |
Sep |
0.2080 |
0.0000 |
| Feb |
0.0900 |
0.0000 |
Jun |
0.2110 |
0.0000 |
Oct |
0.3680 |
0.0000 |
| Mar |
0.1310 |
0.0000 |
Jul |
0.2690 |
0.0000 |
Nov |
0.2800 |
0.0000 |
| Apr |
0.1610 |
0.0000 |
Aug |
0.2360 |
0.0000 |
Dec |
0.2880 |
0.0000 |
The max day use cannot be provided because the master meters between Sanford and the Chatham East system are not read every day. A comparison of the average use in 2002 (0.212 MGD) against the maximum month use (0.368 in October 2002) provides a peakign factor of just under 1.75. 
Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| City of Sanford |
03-53-010 |
0.2120 |
365 |
0.2300 |
2005 |
|
|
8-12 |
Regular |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.0000 |
May |
0.0000 |
Sep |
0.0000 |
| Feb |
0.0000 |
Jun |
0.0000 |
Oct |
0.0000 |
| Mar |
0.0000 |
Jul |
0.0000 |
Nov |
0.0000 |
| Apr |
0.0000 |
Aug |
0.0000 |
Dec |
0.0000 |

5. Planning
Projections
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Year-Round Population |
835 |
2,286 |
2,862 |
4,323 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.0410 |
0.1620 |
0.2120 |
0.3080 |
| Commercial |
0.0080 |
0.0120 |
0.0140 |
0.0210 |
| Industrial |
0.0800 |
0.1260 |
0.1460 |
0.2050 |
| Institutional |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| System Process |
0.0150 |
0.0200 |
0.0260 |
0.0370 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.0680 |
0.0480 |
0.0470 |
0.0570 |
Populations to be served projections are based on Chatham County Data found in Jordan Lake Water Supply Allocation Round-3, DWR Staff Recommendations Report, October 2001 Water use based on Chatham County Data found in Jordan Lake Water Supply Allocation Round-3, DWR Staff Recommendations Report, October 2001 Future Supply Sources
| Source Name |
PWSID |
Source Type |
Additional Supply |
Year Online |
Year Offline |
Type |
| Chatham County North |
03-19-126 |
Surface |
0.7500 |
2005 |
|
Regular |
The Chatham County North water system includes the Jordan Lake Water Treatment Plant. If the bond referendum is passed in 2004 the County will complete expansion projects that will interconnect all of the existing Chatham County water systems. This will allow the transfer of water from the Jordan Lake WTP to the Chatham Southwest system. It is possible that all Chatham County systems will be consolidated under one PWSID, however this submittal assumes each system will continue to operate independently. The Jordan Lake WTP is being high-rated to 4.0 MGD in 2004 and expanded to 6.0 MGD by 2008. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
0.2300 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
0.7500 |
0.7500 |
0.7500 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
0.2300 |
0.7500 |
0.7500 |
0.7500 |
| Service Area Demand |
0.2120 |
0.3680 |
0.4450 |
0.6280 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
0.2120 |
0.3680 |
0.4450 |
0.6280 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
92% |
49% |
59% |
84% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 49 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|