Fayetteville

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.

1. System Information

Contact Information

Complete

Water System Name: Fayetteville   PWSID: 03-26-010
Mailing Address:P. O. Box 1089
Fayetteville, NC 28302		Ownership:Municipality
 
Contact Person:Misty ManningTitle:Chief Operating Officer-W/R
Phone:910-223-4736Cell/Mobile:--
 
Secondary Contact:Jason Green Phone:910-223-4710
Mailing Address:508 Hoffer Drive
Fayetteville, NC 28301		Cell/Mobile:--
Distribution System
Line Type Size Range (Inches) Estimated % of lines
Asbestos Cement 2-16 17.00 %
Cast Iron 4-30 20.00 %
Ductile Iron 4-48 22.00 %
Galvanized Iron 2 1.00 %
Polyvinyl Chloride 2-16 40.00 %
What are the estimated total miles of distribution system lines?   1,210 Miles
How many feet of distribution lines were replaced during 2002?   26,500 Feet
How many feet of new water mains were added during 2002?   134,250 Feet
How many meters were replaced in 2002?   3,800
How old are the oldest meters in this system?   12 Year(s)
How many meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, are not billed for sewer services?   3,900
What is this system's finished water storage capacity?   36.0000 Million Gallons
Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system since last update? Line breaks that were repaired quickly should not be included.   No
Programs
Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants?   Yes, 12 Months or more
Does this system have a valve exercise program?   Yes, Annually
Does this system have a cross-connection program?   Yes
Does this system have a program to replace meters?   Yes
Does this system have a plumbing retrofit program?   No
Does this system have an active water conservation public education program?   Yes
Does this system have a leak detection program?   No
Water Conservation
What type of rate structure is used?   Other
How much reclaimed water does this system use?   0.0000 MGD   For how many connections?   0
Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an emergency?   No

2. Water Use Information

Service Area
Sub-Basin(s)% of Service Population
Cape Fear River (02-3)0 %
County(s)% of Service Population
Cumberland0 %
What was the year-round population served in 2002?   178,200
Has this system acquired another system since last report?   
Water Use by Type
Type of Use Metered
Connections		 Metered
Average Use (MGD)		 Non-Metered
Connections		 Non-Metered
Estimated Use (MGD)
Residential 62,588 11.5580 0 0.0000
Commercial 5,793 5.8620 0 0.0000
Industrial 14 3.0590 0 0.0000
Institutional 0 0.0000 0 0.0000

How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)?   1.7900 MGD

Water Sales
Purchaser PWSID Average
Daily Sold
(MGD)		 Days
Used		 Contract Required to
comply with water
use restrictions?		 Pipe Size(s)
(Inches)		 Use
Type
MGD Expiration Recurring
Brettonwood Hills 03-26-286 0.0170 365 0.0000 16 Regular
Fort Bragg 03-26-344 1.4500 7 10.1410 16 Regular
Hoke County 03-47-025 0.1320 365 0.1320 16 Regular
Kelly Hills 03-26-300 0.0080 365 0.0000 16 Regular
Town of Spring Lake 03-26-020 0.7820 365 2.0000 16 Regular

3. Water Supply Sources

Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)		 Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)		 Average Daily
Use (MGD)		 Max Day
Use (MGD)
Jan 20.9980 24.0260 May 29.8570 35.0470 Sep 23.6050 24.9070
Feb 20.6240 22.5970 Jun 33.0810 40.0570 Oct 22.1160 25.1480
Mar 21.5200 23.4120 Jul 29.3320 35.6500 Nov 20.5870 22.6850
Apr 26.0220 33.4770 Aug 26.4960 30.4920 Dec 19.1700 21.2840

Surface Water Sources
Stream Reservoir Average Daily Withdrawal Maximum Day
Withdrawal (MGD)		 Available Raw
Water Supply		 Usable On-Stream
Raw Water Supply
Storage (MG)
MGD Days Used MGD * Qualifier
Big Cross Creek 1.5000 20 1.5000 2.0000 T 0.0000
Cape Fear - 2 9.1900 223 12.5060 85.8000 F 0.0000
Cape Fear River - 1 16.3520 365 30.0950 0.0000 F 0.0000
Little Cross Creek Glenville Lake 7.9750 142 12.3790 5.0000 SY50 50.0000

* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit

Surface Water Sources (continued)
Stream Reservoir Drainage Area
(sq mi)		 Metered? Sub-Basin County Year
Offline		 Use
Type
Big Cross Creek 15 No Cape Fear River (02-3) Cumberland Regular
Cape Fear - 2 4,360 Yes Cape Fear River (02-3) Cumberland Regular
Cape Fear River - 1 4,360 Yes Cape Fear River (02-3) Cumberland Regular
Little Cross Creek Glenville Lake 9 Yes Cape Fear River (02-3) Cumberland Regular
What is this system's off-stream raw water supply storage capacity?   0 Million gallons
Are surface water sources monitored?   ,
Are you required to maintain minimum flows downstream of its intake or dam?   No
Does this system anticipate transferring surface water between river basins?   No

Analysis of available supply from the Cape Fear River is currently still ongoing. The results from this analysis will establish PWC's total available water supply and in turn determine its future water supply deficiencies. Until this analysis is completed, the available water supply information shown in this 2002 plan is preliminary and subject to change


An 85.8 mgd estimate of PWC's available supply was presented in DWR's October 2001 Round Three Jordan Lake water supply allocation recommendations and in DWR's March 2002 draft Cape Fear River Basin Water Supply Plan. (PWC would like to note that DWR's estimate relies on a 7Q10 estimate which appeared too high to us based on recent USGS analysis.)

Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name Permitted Capacity
(MGD)		 Is Raw Water Metered? Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? Source
Glenville Lake WTF 18.0000 Yes Yes Glenville Lake, Cape Fear River
P.O. Hoffer WTF 32.0000 Yes Yes Cape Fear River
Did average daily water production exceed 80% of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2002?  No
     If yes, was any water conservation implemented?  No
Did average daily water production exceed 90% of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2002?  No
     If yes, was any water conservation implemented?  
Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity in the next 10 years?  No

4. Wastewater Information

Monthly Discharges
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)		 Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)		 Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Jan 22.4000 May 21.1000 Sep 21.1000
Feb 21.7000 Jun 20.2000 Oct 20.6000
Mar 21.0000 Jul 20.5000 Nov 22.0000
Apr 22.0000 Aug 21.0000 Dec 21.6000

How many sewer connections does this system have?   59,000
How many water service connections with septic systems does this system have?   12,100
Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years?   Yes
Wastewater Permits
Permit Number Type Permitted Capacity
(MGD)		 Design Capacity
(MGD)		 Average Annual
Daily Discharge
(MGD)		 Maximum Day Discharge
(MGD)		 Receiving Stream Receiving Basin
NC0023957 25.0000 25.0000 10.7000 17.6000 Cape Fear River Cape Fear River (02-3)
NC0050105 16.0000 16.0000 10.8000 13.9000 Cape Fear River Cape Fear River (02-3)
W20000527 0.0000 0.0000 0.1290 0.2500 Cape Fear River Cape Fear River (02-3)

5. Planning

Projections
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Year-Round Population 178,200 243,160 315,840 402,480
Seasonal Population 0 0 0 0
 
Residential 11.5580 17.8000 22.0000 27.0000
Commercial 5.8620 6.0000 7.3000 8.8000
Industrial 3.0590 7.7000 11.9000 15.8000
Institutional 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
System Process 1.7900 2.6000 3.5000 4.4000
Unaccounted-for 1.9157 2.0000 2.6000 3.3000

Population Figures from the 2002 PWC Water Masterplan and the 2000 Jordan Lake Water Supply Allocation Application for PWC.

Future Water Sales
Purchaser PWSID Contract Pipe Size(s) (Inches) Use Type
MGD Year Begin Year End
Town of Stedman 03-26-030 5.0000 2004 12 Regular
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Surface Water Supply 92.8000 92.8000 92.8000 92.8000
Ground Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Purchases 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Supplies 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Available Supply (MGD) 92.8000 92.8000 92.8000 92.8000
Service Area Demand 24.1847 36.1000 47.3000 59.3000
Sales 0.9668 12.2980 12.2980 12.2980
Future Sales 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000
Total Demand (MGD) 25.1515 53.3980 64.5980 76.5980
Demand as Percent of Supply 27% 58% 70% 83%

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.

Your long-term water demand is 65 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.    

Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?   

What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?   

How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?   

Analysis of available supply from the Cape Fear River is currently still ongoing. The results from this analysis will establish PWC's total available water supply and in turn determine its future water supply deficiencies.

Until this analysis is completed, the available water supply from the Cape Fear River shown in this 2002 plan is preliminary and subject to change.

An 85.8 mgd estimate of PWC's available supply was presented in DWR's October 2001 Round Three Jordan Lake water supply allocation recommendations and in DWR's March 2002 draft Cape Fear River Basin Water Supply Plan. (PWC would like to note that DWR's estimate relies on a 7Q10 estimate which appeared too high to us based on recent USGS analysis.)

Some clarification on the debate between PWC and the State on the issue of PWC's available water supply follows: We have previously argued to the State that, for run-of-river intakes, the use of average demand is inappropriate when comparing demand to available supply. PWC's seasonal demands will be much higher than its average annual demand forecasts. Based on PWC operating records for five years (January 1997 through December 2001), we calculated maximum monthly and weekly demand factors were 1.26 and 1.44, respectively. Seasonal demand peaks are critical for run-of river intakes, especially to the degree that those demand peaks may coincide with reduced flow levels below Jordan Lake. If one accepts DWR's available supply estimate of 85.8 mgd, PWC argues that it would be in a deficit situation before 2030 since our projected maximum weekly demand for 2030 would be 93.3 mgd (i.e., 64.8 mgd average 2030 demand x 1.44 maximum weekly demand factor).

Untill the Cape Fear River model is completed by the State of NC, this analysis and future water supply need predictions cannot be made by PWC.

Additional Information

Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning?  Yes

What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?  Draft Technical Memorandum entitled PWC Water Master Plan and Cumberland County Rural Water Study: Water Demands and Preliminary Rural Water District Evaluation (Camp Dresser and McKee, May 2001), Water Supply Master Plan (CDM, December 1995); Cumberland County Preliminary Sitting and Reservoir Feasibility Study (Geometrics Engineering, January 2000); Implementation of an Aquifer Storage and Recovery System, Preliminary Engineering Report (Hazen and Sawyer, May 1997); Site Feasibility Study for the P.O. Hoffer Raw Water Impoundment (CDM, July 1998).

Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:   As discussed in the introductory letter of the draft Jordan Lake Supply Allocation Application, an analysis of available supply from the Cape Fear River is currently on going. The results from this analysis will establish PWC’s total available water supply, and, in turn, determine its future water supply deficiencies. Until this analysis is completed, predictions cannot be made on PWC’s future water supply needs.

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.