|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Incomplete
| Water System Name: |
Spring Lake |
|
PWSID: |
03-26-020 |
| Mailing Address: | 300 Ruth Street Spring Lake, NC 28390 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Tim Garner | Title: | Water Resources Director |
| Phone: | 910-436-0241 | Cell/Mobile: | 336-963-5919 |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
6-8 |
5.00 % |
| Cast Iron |
6-8 |
25.00 % |
| Ductile Iron |
6-8 |
10.00 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
2 |
5.00 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-12 |
55.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Cape Fear River (02-3) | 0 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Cumberland | 0 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
3,878 |
0.5170 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
416 |
0.1660 |
8 |
0.0380 |
| Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
5 |
0.0080 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0000 MGD
Population served in 1992 and 1997 appears to be over estimated per Jack Vannoy, DPW.
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.6200 |
0.8410 |
May |
0.7380 |
1.1000 |
Sep |
0.7030 |
0.8890 |
| Feb |
0.6870 |
0.8270 |
Jun |
0.7290 |
1.1100 |
Oct |
0.7200 |
1.1700 |
| Mar |
0.7080 |
0.8930 |
Jul |
0.8050 |
1.1100 |
Nov |
0.6840 |
1.3400 |
| Apr |
0.7680 |
0.9550 |
Aug |
0.7650 |
0.9400 |
Dec |
0.6120 |
1.2000 |

Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| PWC-Fayetteville |
03-26-010 |
0.7820 |
365 |
2.0000 |
|
|
|
16 |
Regular |
Fayetteville PWC contract calls for a minimum purchase of 400,000 gpd and does not set a maximum although the system will pump at a capacity of approximately 2 mgd. Therefore, the total water provided by PWC could be approximately 2,000,000 gpd.
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.7710 |
May |
0.6460 |
Sep |
0.6040 |
| Feb |
0.7160 |
Jun |
0.6470 |
Oct |
0.5970 |
| Mar |
0.6840 |
Jul |
0.6330 |
Nov |
0.7070 |
| Apr |
0.6810 |
Aug |
0.6280 |
Dec |
0.7520 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0030970 |
|
1.5000 |
1.5000 |
0.6700 |
1.5000 |
Lower Little River |
Cape Fear River (02-3) |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Year-Round Population |
9,565 |
10,065 |
11,575 |
13,310 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.5170 |
0.6460 |
0.9690 |
1.1140 |
| Commercial |
0.2040 |
0.2560 |
0.2930 |
0.3370 |
| Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0.0080 |
0.0900 |
0.0900 |
0.1050 |
| System Process |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.0530 |
0.0700 |
0.1000 |
0.1000 |
The 2010 planning period, indicates potential annexations. Others indicate approximately 1.5% growth per year. Future Supply Sources
| Source Name |
PWSID |
Source Type |
Additional Supply |
Year Online |
Year Offline |
Type |
| Harnett County |
03-43-045 |
Purchase |
1.0000 |
2003 |
|
Regular |
Harnett County contract is for a minimum purchase of 150,000 gpd and allows for a maximum of 1,000,000 gpd. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
1.0000 |
1.0000 |
1.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
2.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
| Service Area Demand |
0.7820 |
1.0620 |
1.4520 |
1.6560 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
0.7820 |
1.0620 |
1.4520 |
1.6560 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
39% |
35% |
48% |
55% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 54 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Spring Lake current contracts call for a total minimum purchase of 550,000 gpd. However, the Harnett County Contract allows for a maximum of 1,000,000 gpd. The Fayetteville PWC contract does not set a maximum although the system will pump at a capacity of approximately 2 mgd. Therefore, the total water provided would currently be approximately 3,000,000 gpd. Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? Yes
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: The Town recently passed a 6,000,000 bond issue to upgrade substandard lines, valves and fire hydrants. Futhermore, the bonds included the construction of an additional 750,000 gallon water storage facility. These upgrades should provide the Town with long term water storage and greatly reduce the maintenance of the current system.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|