Hoke County Regional Water System

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.

1. System Information

Contact Information

Incomplete

Water System Name: Hoke County Regional Water System   PWSID: 03-47-025
Mailing Address:P. O. Box 240
Raeford, NC 28376
Ownership:County
 
Contact Person:James McQueenTitle:Utilities Director
Phone:910-848-0385Cell/Mobile:910-992-0937
Distribution System
Line Type Size Range (Inches) Estimated % of lines
Ductile Iron 4-12 1.00 %
Polyvinyl Chloride 2-12 99.00 %
What are the estimated total miles of distribution system lines?   307 Miles
How many feet of distribution lines were replaced during 2002?   0 Feet
How many feet of new water mains were added during 2002?   562,657 Feet
How many meters were replaced in 2002?   500
How old are the oldest meters in this system?   12 Year(s)
How many meters for outdoor water use, such as irrigation, are not billed for sewer services?   0
What is this system's finished water storage capacity?   2.3000 Million Gallons
Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system since last update? Line breaks that were repaired quickly should not be included.   No
Programs
Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants?   Yes, 2-6 Months
Does this system have a valve exercise program?   No, None
Does this system have a cross-connection program?   Yes
Does this system have a program to replace meters?   Yes
Does this system have a plumbing retrofit program?   No
Does this system have an active water conservation public education program?   No
Does this system have a leak detection program?   No
Water Conservation
What type of rate structure is used?   Increasing
How much reclaimed water does this system use?   0.0000 MGD   For how many connections?   0
Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an emergency?   Yes

2. Water Use Information

Service Area
Sub-Basin(s)% of Service Population
Lumber River (09-1)0 %
Cape Fear River (02-3)0 %
County(s)% of Service Population
Hoke0 %
What was the year-round population served in 2002?   24,900
Has this system acquired another system since last report?   
Water Use by Type
Type of Use Metered
Connections
Metered
Average Use (MGD)
Non-Metered
Connections
Non-Metered
Estimated Use (MGD)
Residential 7,625 1.2330 0 0.0000
Commercial 0 0.0000 0 0.0000
Industrial 0 0.0000 0 0.0000
Institutional 0 0.0000 0 0.0000

How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)?   0.0120 MGD

Available water records for the year 2002 do not separate types of customers. Based on this report, the amount of raw water is less than the finished water metered. Hoke Co RWS needs to look at the instrumentation to see if there is a calibration problem. Without knowing what is wrong adjustments to the water use numbers cannot be made at this time.

Water Sales
Purchaser PWSID Average
Daily Sold
(MGD)
Days
Used
Contract Required to
comply with water
use restrictions?
Pipe Size(s)
(Inches)
Use
Type
MGD Expiration Recurring
Raeford 03-47-010 0.0000 0 0.5000 12 Emergency

3. Water Supply Sources

Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
Average Daily
Use (MGD)
Max Day
Use (MGD)
Average Daily
Use (MGD)
Max Day
Use (MGD)
Average Daily
Use (MGD)
Max Day
Use (MGD)
Jan 1.1640 1.4640 May 0.8980 1.5080 Sep 1.2060 1.4680
Feb 1.1660 1.4700 Jun 1.2710 1.7600 Oct 1.1230 1.4850
Mar 1.2660 1.5850 Jul 1.5070 1.8510 Nov 1.0580 1.4050
Apr 1.4490 2.0740 Aug 1.3420 1.8040 Dec 1.0070 1.4640

Based on this report, the amount of raw water is less than the finished water metered. Hoke Co RWS needs to look at the instrumentation to see if there is a calibration problem. Without knowing what is wrong adjustments to the water use numbers cannot be made at this time.

Ground Water Sources
Name or Number Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) 12-Hour Supply
(MGD)
CUA Reduction Year Offline Use Type
MGD Days Used
1 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1800 Regular
10 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1800 Regular
11 0.0000 0 0.000 0.0000 Regular
12 0.0000 0 0.000 0.0000 Regular
13 0.0810 75 0.233 0.0860 Regular
14 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1510 Regular
2 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1750 Regular
3 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1720 Regular
4A 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1510 Regular
5A 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1510 Regular
6 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1440 Regular
7 0.2210 365 0.211 0.2160 Regular
8 0.0350 113 0.179 0.0900 Regular
9A 0.0000 0 0.000 0.1730 Regular
Ground Water Sources (continued)
Name or Number Well Depth (Feet) Casing Depth
(Feet)
Screen Depth (Feet) Well Diameter (Inches) Pump Intake Depth (Feet) Metered?
Top Bottom
1 137 0 112 132 8 0 Yes
10 125 40 70 120 8 0 Yes
11 83 20 61 76 8 0 Yes
12 105 20 61 100 8 0 Yes
13 177 50 90 170 8 0 Yes
14 120 60 81 111 8 0 Yes
2 130 0 105 125 8 0 Yes
3 133 55 60 128 10 0 Yes
4A 120 32 60 115 8 0 Yes
5A 102 40 77 97 8 0 Yes
6 144 55 85 137 8 130 Yes
7 121 55 101 116 8 112 Yes
8 0 0 0 0 8 0 Yes
9A 104 40 59 99 8 0 Yes
Are ground water levels monitored?   No, None
Does this system have a wellhead protection program?   Und

Wells #11 and #12 were not used in the year 2002. Based on this report, the amount of raw water is less than the finished water metered. Hoke Co RWS needs to look at the instrumentation to see if there is a calibration problem. Without knowing what is wrong adjustments to the water use numbers cannot be made at this time.

Water Purchases From Other Systems
Seller PWSID Average
Daily Purchased
(MGD)
Days
Used
Contract Required to
comply with water
use restrictions?
Pipe Size(s)
(Inches)
Use
Type
MGD Expiration Recurring
Fayetteville PWC 03-26-010 0.2060 245 0.0000 12 Regular
N.C. Dept. of Corrections 03-47-108 0.1150 365 0.0000 8-12 Regular
Robeson Co 03-78-055 0.0000 0 0.0000 6 Emergency

North Carolina Dept. Of Corrections contract expired 8/20/2000. Based on this report, the amount of raw water is less than the finished water metered. Hoke Co RWS needs to look at the instrumentation to see if there is a calibration problem. Without knowing what is wrong adjustments to the water use numbers cannot be made at this time.

Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name Permitted Capacity
(MGD)
Is Raw Water Metered? Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? Source
Airport WTP 0.7040 Yes Yes Wells 3 & 10
Antioch WTP 0.7200 Yes Yes Wells 1& 2
Arabia WTP 0.4520 Yes Yes Well 7
Carolina Drive WTP 0.9500 Yes Yes Wells 4A, 5A & 9A
Doc Brown Road WTP 0.5900 Yes Yes Wells 6 & 14
Neil Sinclair Road WTP 0.1720 Yes Yes Well 13
Rockfish WTP 0.1800 Yes Yes Well 8
Did average daily water production exceed 80% of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2002?  No
     If yes, was any water conservation implemented?  
Did average daily water production exceed 90% of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2002?  No
     If yes, was any water conservation implemented?  
Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity in the next 10 years?  No

4. Wastewater Information

Monthly Discharges
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Average Daily
Discharge (MGD)
Jan 0.0920 May 0.0820 Sep 0.0900
Feb 0.1020 Jun 0.0780 Oct 0.0700
Mar 0.0800 Jul 0.0780 Nov 0.0970
Apr 0.0780 Aug 0.0780 Dec 0.1020

How many sewer connections does this system have?   1
How many water service connections with septic systems does this system have?   7,624
Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years?   No
Wastewater Permits
Permit Number Type Permitted Capacity
(MGD)
Design Capacity
(MGD)
Average Annual
Daily Discharge
(MGD)
Maximum Day Discharge
(MGD)
Receiving Stream Receiving Basin
NC0086037 0.0200 0.0200 0.0420 0.1370 Little Marsh Swamp Lumber River (09-1)
NC0086045 0.0100 0.0100 0.0440 0.0680 Raft Swamp Lumber River (09-1)

5. Planning

Projections
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Year-Round Population 24,900 31,900 40,650 49,400
Seasonal Population 0 0 0 0
 
Residential 1.2330 1.5950 2.0320 2.4700
Commercial 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Industrial 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Institutional 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
System Process 0.0120 0.0160 0.0200 0.0240
Unaccounted-for -0.7432 0.3500 0.4470 0.5430
Future Supply Sources
Source Name PWSID Source Type Additional Supply Year Online Year Offline Type
11 Wells (3 WTPs) 03-47-025 Ground 1.6790 2009 Regular
2 Wells 03-47-025 Ground 0.2880 2035 Regular
Adcox Road WTP 03-47-025 Ground 0.1440 2005 Regular
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
  2002 2010 2020 2030
Surface Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Ground Water Supply 1.8690 1.8690 1.8690 1.8690
Purchases 0.3210 0.3210 0.3210 0.3210
Future Supplies 1.8230 1.8230 1.8230
Total Available Supply (MGD) 2.1900 4.0130 4.0130 4.0130
Service Area Demand 0.5018 1.9610 2.4990 3.0370
Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Demand (MGD) 0.5018 1.9610 2.4990 3.0370
Demand as Percent of Supply 23% 49% 62% 76%

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.

Your long-term water demand is 50 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.    

Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?   

What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?   

How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?   

Additional Information

Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning?  Yes

What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?  1997 WSP

Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:   

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers. DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.