The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
Water System Name: |
Richmond County |
|
PWSID: |
03-77-109 |
Mailing Address: | PO Box 504 Rockingham, NC 28380 | Ownership: | County |
|
Contact Person: | Lee P. Butler | Title: | Water Plant Superintendent |
Phone: | 910-997-8339 | Cell/Mobile: | 910-206-3098 |
|
Secondary Contact: | Bryan Land | | Phone: | 910-997-8211 |
Mailing Address: | po box 504 rockingham, NC 28380 | Cell/Mobile: | 910-206-3098 |
Distribution System
Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
Asbestos Cement |
6-16 |
39.40 % |
Ductile Iron |
4-24 |
7.80 % |
Galvanized Iron |
1-2 |
1.80 % |
Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-14 |
51.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
Yadkin River (18-1) | 98 % |
Lumber River (09-1) | 2 % |
|
County(s) | % of Service Population |
Richmond | 100 % |
|
Keeping existing map on file. Water Use by Type
Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
Residential |
7,728 |
1.0920 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Commercial |
171 |
1.0180 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Industrial |
65 |
0.6090 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.2970 MGD
Institutional usage is included in commercial numbers. Water Sales
Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
City of Rockingham |
03-77-015 |
0.5360 |
279 |
0.3330 |
2012 |
Yes |
Yes |
8, 12 |
Regular |
Ellerbe |
03-77-020 |
0.0896 |
365 |
0.2200 |
2012 |
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
Hamlet |
03-77-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
2012 |
Yes |
Yes |
14,16 |
Emergency |
The amount of water sold to Ellerbe is estimated due to meter inaccuracy. Richmond County is in the process of replacing the inaccurate meters.
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
Jan |
3.5050 |
|
May |
3.7200 |
|
Sep |
4.2650 |
|
Feb |
3.2930 |
|
Jun |
4.5890 |
|
Oct |
3.6630 |
|
Mar |
3.2990 |
|
Jul |
4.3260 |
|
Nov |
3.4730 |
|
Apr |
3.5560 |
|
Aug |
4.4950 |
|
Dec |
3.7370 |
|

Surface Water Sources
Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
Pee Dee River |
Blewett Falls Lake |
3.7080 |
365 |
5.5440 |
28.0000 |
C |
10,427.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
Pee Dee River |
Blewett Falls Lake |
6,821 |
Yes |
Yadkin River (18-1) |
Richmond |
|
Regular |
Blewett Falls Lake is a reservoir on the Pee Dee River that is created by a dam owned and operated by Duke Energy. Water from the system on the Northern end of the system is used by the residents there who utilize a small sewer system and mostly septic tanks and the water from that migrates to the Lumber River Basin. Water Purchases From Other Systems
Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Anson County |
03-04-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.8000 |
2019 |
No |
Yes |
20 |
Emergency |
Hamlet |
03-77-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
2012 |
No |
Yes |
12,14 |
Emergency |
We used water from Anson County to flush hydrant before pump station only and did not purchase water that was pumped into our water system during the calendar year 2022. No water was purchased from Hamlet during the same time. Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
Richmond County |
9.2000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Blewett Falls Lake |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Jan |
0.0320 |
May |
0.0550 |
Sep |
0.0390 |
Feb |
0.0140 |
Jun |
0.0330 |
Oct |
0.0360 |
Mar |
0.0110 |
Jul |
0.0600 |
Nov |
0.0220 |
Apr |
0.0080 |
Aug |
0.0680 |
Dec |
0.0310 |

Wastewater Permits
Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
NC0081281 |
WTP |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Pee Dee River |
Yadkin River (18-1) |
Wastewater Interconnections
Water System |
PWSID |
Type |
Average Daily Amount |
Contract Maximum (MGD) |
MGD |
Days Used |
City of Rockingham |
03-77-015 |
Discharging |
0.0340 |
365 |
0.0000 |
5. Planning
Projections
|
2022 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Year-Round Population |
19,910 |
21,317 |
22,382 |
23,501 |
24,676 |
25,910 |
Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Residential |
1.0920 |
1.2170 |
1.2780 |
1.3420 |
1.4090 |
1.4790 |
Commercial |
1.0180 |
1.0450 |
1.0987 |
1.1650 |
1.1950 |
1.2250 |
Industrial |
0.6090 |
0.6850 |
0.6950 |
0.7150 |
0.7250 |
0.7350 |
Institutional |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
System Process |
0.2970 |
0.2840 |
0.3840 |
0.4840 |
0.5840 |
0.6840 |
Unaccounted-for |
0.1927 |
0.2203 |
0.2303 |
0.2421 |
0.2508 |
0.2597 |
Projections were carried from last year because of negative population growth from 2021 thru 2022. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
|
2022 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Surface Water Supply |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Available Supply (MGD) |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
28.0000 |
Service Area Demand |
3.2087 |
3.4513 |
3.6860 |
3.9481 |
4.1638 |
4.3827 |
Sales |
0.4993 |
0.7560 |
0.7560 |
0.7560 |
0.7560 |
0.7560 |
Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Demand (MGD) |
3.7080 |
4.2073 |
4.4420 |
4.7041 |
4.9198 |
5.1387 |
Demand as Percent of Supply |
13% |
15% |
16% |
17% |
18% |
18% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 55 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
No Changes
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? No Changes
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? No Changes
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? No Changes
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|