|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Incomplete
| Water System Name: |
Kelford |
|
PWSID: |
04-08-025 |
| Mailing Address: | P.O. Box 97 Kelford, NC 27847 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Carroll Minton | Title: | System Operator |
| Phone: | 252-344-2691 | Cell/Mobile: | |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
2-12 |
100.00 % |
Asbestos Cement & Galvanized Steel lines. Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Roanoke River (14-1) | 0 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Bertie | 0 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
119 |
0.0140 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
2 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0 |
0.0000 |
1 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0000 MGD
Commercial = 0.00018 mgd, Non-Metered Institutional = 0.00003 mgd. After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn.
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.0180 |
0.0690 |
May |
0.0240 |
0.0700 |
Sep |
0.0590 |
0.1330 |
| Feb |
0.0170 |
0.0630 |
Jun |
0.0260 |
0.1080 |
Oct |
0.0460 |
0.1600 |
| Mar |
0.0170 |
0.0670 |
Jul |
0.0250 |
0.0820 |
Nov |
0.0310 |
0.0980 |
| Apr |
0.0300 |
0.0870 |
Aug |
0.0460 |
0.1130 |
Dec |
0.0260 |
0.1040 |
After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn. 
Ground Water Sources
| Name or Number |
Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) |
Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
12-Hour Supply (MGD) |
CUA Reduction |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| W01 |
0.0260 |
365 |
0.160 |
0.0580 |
|
|
Regular |
| W02 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.0100 |
|
|
Emergency |
Ground Water Sources (continued)
| Name or Number |
Well Depth (Feet) |
Casing Depth (Feet) |
Screen Depth (Feet) |
Well Diameter (Inches) |
Pump Intake Depth (Feet) |
Metered? |
| Top |
Bottom |
| W01 |
350 |
0 |
130 |
180 |
8 |
0 |
Yes |
| W02 |
350 |
0 |
130 |
180 |
8 |
0 |
No |
Over weekend - not recorded for Saturday, Sunday, Monday separately. Now record every day. After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn.
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.0000 |
May |
0.0000 |
Sep |
0.0000 |
| Feb |
0.0000 |
Jun |
0.0000 |
Oct |
0.0000 |
| Mar |
0.0000 |
Jul |
0.0000 |
Nov |
0.0000 |
| Apr |
0.0000 |
Aug |
0.0000 |
Dec |
0.0000 |

5. Planning
Projections
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Year-Round Population |
247 |
250 |
240 |
230 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.0140 |
0.0140 |
0.0130 |
0.0130 |
| Commercial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| System Process |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.0120 |
0.0120 |
0.0120 |
0.0120 |
Had 20 sites added mid-year: Farm divided and sold lots. Future Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Contract |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Year Begin |
Year End |
| Bertie Co RWS |
04-08-085 |
0.0000 |
|
|
0 |
Emergency |
Contract Signed - Line not installed - Will turn on when emergency creates need - not metered. Future Supply Sources
| Source Name |
PWSID |
Source Type |
Additional Supply |
Year Online |
Year Offline |
Type |
| Bertie Co RWS |
04-08-085 |
Ground |
0.0000 |
|
|
Emergency |
Contract Signed - Line not installed - Will turn on when emergency creates need - not metered. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0580 |
0.0580 |
0.0580 |
0.0580 |
| Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
0.0580 |
0.0580 |
0.0580 |
0.0580 |
| Service Area Demand |
0.0260 |
0.0260 |
0.0250 |
0.0250 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
0.0260 |
0.0260 |
0.0250 |
0.0250 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
45% |
45% |
43% |
43% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 57 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: Kelford adopted a Capital Improvements Plan prepared by Cavanaugh in March 2003. At present, Kelford is trying to get financial grants to proceed. The Plan calls for new lines and meters. We lose 38.89% in leaks (according to study) in February 2002 and 55.4% in leaks in August 2002.
The Plan calls for a new well.
The Plan calls for tank rehabilitiation.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|