|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
South Mills |
|
PWSID: |
04-15-010 |
| Mailing Address: | P.O. Box 279 South Mills, NC 27976 | Ownership: | Non-Profit |
| |
| Contact Person: | Charles Sawyer | Title: | ORC |
| Phone: | 252-771-5620 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
6-8 |
3.00 % |
| Ductile Iron |
10 |
2.00 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-8 |
95.00 % |
AC = 3.38%, DI = 1.86%, PVC = 94.76% Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Albemarle Sound (12-1) | 0 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Camden | 0 % |
| Pasquotank | 0 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
1,776 |
0.2150 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0000 MGD
After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn. The discrepancy is due to well operation. Wells are run on an alternating schedule. The withdrawals are pumped through a single intake into the filter plant with a master meter reading taken after filtration. The alternating withdrawals along with filtration losses makes it difficult to accurately determine the average daily withdrawal for each well.
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.2340 |
0.3360 |
May |
0.2620 |
0.3390 |
Sep |
0.2760 |
0.4310 |
| Feb |
0.2400 |
0.3500 |
Jun |
0.2820 |
0.4460 |
Oct |
0.2990 |
0.5940 |
| Mar |
0.2440 |
0.7880 |
Jul |
0.2910 |
0.4560 |
Nov |
0.2400 |
0.3760 |
| Apr |
0.2790 |
0.4500 |
Aug |
0.2810 |
0.3740 |
Dec |
0.2460 |
0.3150 |
After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn. The discrepancy is due to well operation. Wells are run on an alternating schedule. The withdrawals are pumped through a single intake into the filter plant with a master meter reading taken after filtration. The alternating withdrawals along with filtration losses makes it difficult to accurately determine the average daily withdrawal for each well. 
Ground Water Sources
| Name or Number |
Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) |
Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
12-Hour Supply (MGD) |
CUA Reduction |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| 01 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.040 |
0.0430 |
|
|
Regular |
| 02 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.040 |
0.0470 |
|
|
Regular |
| 07 |
0.0210 |
250 |
0.021 |
0.0220 |
|
|
Regular |
| 08 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.040 |
0.0430 |
|
|
Regular |
| 09 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.036 |
0.0360 |
|
|
Regular |
| 10 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.025 |
0.0250 |
|
|
Regular |
| 11 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.034 |
0.0340 |
|
|
Regular |
| 12 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.036 |
0.0360 |
|
|
Regular |
| 13 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.031 |
0.0310 |
|
|
Regular |
| 16 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.036 |
0.0360 |
|
|
Regular |
| 17 |
0.0200 |
250 |
0.019 |
0.0190 |
|
|
Regular |
| 19 |
0.0240 |
250 |
0.024 |
0.0240 |
|
|
Regular |
| 22 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.029 |
0.0290 |
|
|
Regular |
| 24 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.027 |
0.0270 |
|
|
Regular |
| 25 |
0.0230 |
250 |
0.023 |
0.0230 |
|
|
Regular |
| 26 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.029 |
0.0290 |
|
|
Regular |
| 32 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.026 |
0.0260 |
|
|
Regular |
| 33 |
0.0230 |
250 |
0.023 |
0.0230 |
|
|
Regular |
| 34 |
0.0250 |
250 |
0.040 |
0.0720 |
|
|
Regular |
Ground Water Sources (continued)
| Name or Number |
Well Depth (Feet) |
Casing Depth (Feet) |
Screen Depth (Feet) |
Well Diameter (Inches) |
Pump Intake Depth (Feet) |
Metered? |
| Top |
Bottom |
| 01 |
67 |
66 |
46 |
66 |
6 |
46 |
Yes |
| 02 |
74 |
73 |
53 |
73 |
6 |
52 |
Yes |
| 07 |
71 |
70 |
50 |
70 |
6 |
50 |
Yes |
| 08 |
73 |
72 |
49 |
69 |
6 |
49 |
Yes |
| 09 |
60 |
60 |
40 |
60 |
6 |
40 |
Yes |
| 10 |
71 |
69 |
40 |
66 |
6 |
40 |
Yes |
| 11 |
60 |
60 |
40 |
50 |
6 |
40 |
Yes |
| 12 |
47 |
47 |
37 |
47 |
6 |
37 |
Yes |
| 13 |
51 |
51 |
41 |
51 |
6 |
41 |
Yes |
| 16 |
70 |
69 |
49 |
69 |
6 |
49 |
Yes |
| 17 |
66 |
66 |
38 |
53 |
6 |
38 |
Yes |
| 19 |
70 |
70 |
45 |
60 |
6 |
45 |
Yes |
| 22 |
70 |
70 |
45 |
60 |
6 |
45 |
Yes |
| 24 |
62 |
52 |
40 |
50 |
6 |
40 |
Yes |
| 25 |
73 |
73 |
48 |
63 |
6 |
48 |
Yes |
| 26 |
69 |
68 |
47 |
67 |
6 |
47 |
Yes |
| 32 |
70 |
70 |
50 |
60 |
6 |
50 |
Yes |
| 33 |
72 |
72 |
52 |
62 |
6 |
52 |
Yes |
| 34 |
70 |
70 |
50 |
70 |
6 |
50 |
Yes |
South Mills runs 10 wells each day to reach demand, wells are alternated, >10 wells per day are run to meet peak flow. Total usage is 1/2 of 0.625 mgd or 0.312 mgd (250 days of run time per well was used to provide an approximate total average daily usage). After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears there may be an error between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn. The discrepancy is due to well operation. Wells are run on an alternating schedule. The withdrawals are pumped through a single intake into the filter plant with a master meter reading taken after filtration. The alternating withdrawals along with filtration losses makes it difficult to accurately determine the average daily withdrawal for each well. Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Pasquotank Co |
04-70-015 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
Emergency |
| S Camden WSD |
04-15-015 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.2000 |
|
|
|
6 |
Emergency |
No water purchased in 2002. Pasquotank Co contract has no limit. Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| South Mills |
0.8640 |
Yes |
Yes |
Groundwater (19 shallow wells) |
Source is 19 shallow wells - Yorktown
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.0100 |
May |
0.0110 |
Sep |
0.0130 |
| Feb |
0.0100 |
Jun |
0.0160 |
Oct |
0.0130 |
| Mar |
0.0120 |
Jul |
0.0170 |
Nov |
0.0120 |
| Apr |
0.0140 |
Aug |
0.0130 |
Dec |
0.0110 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0007978 |
|
0.0000 |
0.0250 |
0.0130 |
0.0170 |
Dismal Swamp Canal |
Albemarle Sound (12-1) |
Permit status is "Under Review".
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Year-Round Population |
4,840 |
5,412 |
6,155 |
6,871 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.2150 |
0.2400 |
0.2730 |
0.3050 |
| Commercial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| System Process |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.1008 |
0.0580 |
0.0660 |
0.0740 |
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.6250 |
0.6250 |
0.6250 |
0.6250 |
| Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
0.6250 |
0.6250 |
0.6250 |
0.6250 |
| Service Area Demand |
0.3158 |
0.2980 |
0.3390 |
0.3790 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
0.3158 |
0.2980 |
0.3390 |
0.3790 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
51% |
48% |
54% |
61% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 44 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? Yes
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning? Hydrogeologic frame work and groundwater resources of the North Albemarle Region, North Carolina. by Jeff C. Lautier, NCDENR, DWR, September 1998.
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: Future planned improvements are a 200,000 gallon Water Tower, Booster Pumps for Filling Tower, and Chlorine Booster Systems throughout Distribution System.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|