|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
Edenton |
|
PWSID: |
04-21-010 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 300 Edenton, NC 27932 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Roy Alons | Title: | ORC |
| Phone: | 252-482-4111 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Joey White | | Phone: | 336-960-5822 |
| Mailing Address: | , NC | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Cast Iron |
2-12 |
2.00 % |
| Ductile Iron |
4-12 |
3.00 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
2 |
1.00 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-12 |
94.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Chowan River (04-1) | 0 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Chowan | 0 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
1,688 |
0.2920 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
214 |
0.0950 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
12 |
0.0190 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
103 |
0.0650 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0000 MGD
Used 2003 data. Hurricane damaged 2002 records.
System backwash uses unmetered raw water. No reliable usage records for line flushing. After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears the discrepancy between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn can be attributed to the unmetered raw water used for backwash and the difference in the metered billing reports versus water withdrawals estimated from well runtimes. Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Chowan Co |
04-21-015 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0720 |
|
|
|
10 |
Emergency |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.6950 |
1.1500 |
May |
0.6700 |
0.9740 |
Sep |
0.7260 |
1.5610 |
| Feb |
0.6900 |
1.2530 |
Jun |
0.7080 |
1.1400 |
Oct |
0.7280 |
1.0940 |
| Mar |
0.6720 |
1.0770 |
Jul |
0.6850 |
1.3680 |
Nov |
0.6680 |
1.2020 |
| Apr |
0.6060 |
1.0050 |
Aug |
0.7270 |
1.1630 |
Dec |
0.6300 |
0.8790 |
Used 2003 data. Hurricane damaged 2002 records. After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears the discrepancy between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn can be attributed to the unmetered raw water used for backwash and the difference in the metered billing reports versus water withdrawals estimated from well runtimes. 
Ground Water Sources
| Name or Number |
Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) |
Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
12-Hour Supply (MGD) |
CUA Reduction |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| Beaver Hill-3 |
0.4370 |
365 |
0.876 |
0.3630 |
|
|
Regular |
| Boswell St |
0.2700 |
365 |
0.450 |
0.2700 |
|
|
Regular |
| Freemason 1-A |
0.2620 |
365 |
0.634 |
0.3170 |
|
|
Regular |
| Virginia Road-2 |
0.2640 |
365 |
0.720 |
0.3600 |
|
|
Regular |
Ground Water Sources (continued)
| Name or Number |
Well Depth (Feet) |
Casing Depth (Feet) |
Screen Depth (Feet) |
Well Diameter (Inches) |
Pump Intake Depth (Feet) |
Metered? |
| Top |
Bottom |
| Beaver Hill-3 |
260 |
200 |
210 |
255 |
10 |
140 |
Yes |
| Boswell St |
269 |
269 |
210 |
259 |
10 |
198 |
Yes |
| Freemason 1-A |
272 |
200 |
212 |
267 |
10 |
100 |
Yes |
| Virginia Road-2 |
358 |
140 |
219 |
355 |
10 |
80 |
Yes |
Boswell was originally permitted @ 500 gpm but mechanical problems have reduced it to 375-400 gpm.
Used 2003 data. Hurricane damaged 2002 records. After initial review of plan and further discussion it appears the discrepancy between monthly-metered water connections and the amount of water withdrawn can be attributed to the unmetered raw water used for backwash and the difference in the metered billing reports versus water withdrawals estimated from well runtimes. Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Chowan Co |
04-21-015 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0720 |
|
|
|
10 |
Emergency |
Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| Beaver Hill WTP |
0.7250 |
Yes |
Yes |
Groundwater |
| Freemason WTP |
1.3500 |
Yes |
Yes |
Groundwater |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.0200 |
May |
0.0200 |
Sep |
0.0200 |
| Feb |
0.0200 |
Jun |
0.0200 |
Oct |
0.0200 |
| Mar |
0.0200 |
Jul |
0.0200 |
Nov |
0.0200 |
| Apr |
0.0200 |
Aug |
0.0200 |
Dec |
0.0200 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0007552 |
|
0.0100 |
0.0200 |
0.0100 |
0.0100 |
Pembroke |
Chowan River (04-1) |
| NC0086291 |
|
0.0100 |
0.0100 |
0.0100 |
0.0100 |
Pembroke |
Chowan River (04-1) |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Year-Round Population |
5,394 |
5,519 |
5,679 |
5,843 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.2920 |
0.2980 |
0.3070 |
0.3160 |
| Commercial |
0.0950 |
0.0970 |
0.1000 |
0.1030 |
| Industrial |
0.0190 |
0.0190 |
0.0190 |
0.0210 |
| Institutional |
0.0650 |
0.0660 |
0.0680 |
0.0700 |
| System Process |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.7620 |
0.2210 |
0.2270 |
0.2350 |
2000 Census Data. Projections based on .0029% annual growthCommercial & Institutional follow population. Industrial based on half population increase.
Unaccounted for water based on current losses but system anticipates a 10% reduction by 2010. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2002 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
| Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
1.3100 |
1.3100 |
1.3100 |
1.3100 |
| Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
1.3100 |
1.3100 |
1.3100 |
1.3100 |
| Service Area Demand |
1.2330 |
0.7010 |
0.7210 |
0.7450 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
1.2330 |
0.7010 |
0.7210 |
0.7450 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
94% |
54% |
55% |
57% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 54 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|