The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
Water System Name: |
Havelock |
|
PWSID: |
04-25-015 |
Mailing Address: | P.O. Drawer 368 Havelock, NC 28532 | Ownership: | Municipality |
|
Contact Person: | David Hemenway | Title: | WTP Supervisor/ORC |
Phone: | 252-444-6420 | Cell/Mobile: | 252-670-1263 |
Distribution System
Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
Asbestos Cement |
6-12 |
55.00 % |
Ductile Iron |
6-8 |
10.00 % |
Polyvinyl Chloride |
6-12 |
35.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
Neuse River (10-1) | 100 % |
|
County(s) | % of Service Population |
Craven | 100 % |
|
Water Use by Type
Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
Residential |
5,247 |
0.5433 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Commercial |
690 |
0.1892 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
14 |
0.0189 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.2875 MGD
Water Sales
Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Craven County |
04-25-055 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
2050 |
Yes |
Yes |
10 |
Emergency |
Greenfield Heights Development |
04-25-141 |
0.0070 |
344 |
|
|
Yes |
Yes |
6 |
Regular |
Greenfield Heights was converted to Craven County Water on December 10th.
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
Jan |
1.2886 |
1.5260 |
May |
1.2237 |
1.4990 |
Sep |
1.1919 |
1.5770 |
Feb |
1.1936 |
1.4520 |
Jun |
1.3315 |
1.6050 |
Oct |
1.2508 |
1.7350 |
Mar |
1.2567 |
1.5280 |
Jul |
1.2190 |
1.5140 |
Nov |
1.1147 |
1.3860 |
Apr |
1.2942 |
1.7340 |
Aug |
1.1924 |
1.4860 |
Dec |
1.1471 |
1.8580 |

Ground Water Sources
Name or Number |
Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) |
Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
12-Hour Supply (MGD) |
CUA Reduction |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
MGD |
Days Used |
3 |
0.3507 |
321 |
|
0.7200 |
CUA0 |
|
Regular |
4 |
0.3566 |
250 |
|
0.7200 |
CUA0 |
|
Regular |
5 |
0.4303 |
290 |
|
0.7200 |
CUA0 |
|
Regular |
6A |
0.4431 |
277 |
|
0.8640 |
CUA0 |
|
Regular |
Ground Water Sources (continued)
Name or Number |
Well Depth (Feet) |
Casing Depth (Feet) |
Screen Depth (Feet) |
Well Diameter (Inches) |
Pump Intake Depth (Feet) |
Metered? |
Top |
Bottom |
3 |
250 |
|
164 |
240 |
10 |
74 |
Yes |
4 |
250 |
|
162 |
245 |
10 |
74 |
Yes |
5 |
260 |
|
160 |
250 |
10 |
120 |
Yes |
6A |
260 |
|
170 |
250 |
10 |
100 |
Yes |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Craven County |
04-25-055 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
|
Yes |
Yes |
10 |
Emergency |
Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
Brown Blvd. WTP |
2.8000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Castle Hayne Aquifer |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Jan |
1.3180 |
May |
1.1360 |
Sep |
1.5440 |
Feb |
1.1590 |
Jun |
0.9180 |
Oct |
1.0460 |
Mar |
1.7440 |
Jul |
1.2200 |
Nov |
0.9260 |
Apr |
1.3640 |
Aug |
1.6940 |
Dec |
0.8940 |

Wastewater Permits
Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
NC0021253 |
WWTP |
2.2500 |
4.0000 |
1.2500 |
|
Neuse River |
Neuse River (10-1) |
NC00781310 |
WTP |
0.3600 |
0.4770 |
0.1048 |
|
McCotter Canal |
Neuse River (10-1) |
The 0.1048 MGD discharged to McCotter canal (NC00781310) is backwash water from the water treatment plant and is not included the monthly averages discharged from the WWTP (NC0021253).
5. Planning
Projections
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Year-Round Population |
14,878 |
15,200 |
15,800 |
16,400 |
16,675 |
17,275 |
Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Residential |
0.5433 |
0.6020 |
0.6170 |
0.6320 |
0.6470 |
0.6630 |
Commercial |
0.1892 |
0.1974 |
0.2068 |
0.2162 |
0.2257 |
0.2352 |
Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
0.0189 |
0.0210 |
0.0220 |
0.0230 |
0.0240 |
0.0250 |
System Process |
0.2875 |
0.2900 |
0.2950 |
0.3000 |
0.3045 |
0.3100 |
Unaccounted-for |
0.1820 |
0.1945 |
0.1999 |
0.2052 |
0.2104 |
0.2160 |
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Ground Water Supply |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Available Supply (MGD) |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
2.8000 |
Service Area Demand |
1.2209 |
1.3049 |
1.3407 |
1.3764 |
1.4116 |
1.4492 |
Sales |
0.0066 |
0.0070 |
0.0070 |
0.0070 |
0.0070 |
0.0070 |
Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Demand (MGD) |
1.2275 |
1.3119 |
1.3477 |
1.3834 |
1.4186 |
1.4562 |
Demand as Percent of Supply |
44% |
47% |
48% |
49% |
51% |
52% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 37 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
No Changes.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? Water Conservation Practice and Education.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? City of Havelock Water Treatment Plant Facility Improvements & Feasibility Study and The City of Havelock Master Plan.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? Utilizing engineers and seeing what is needed and how to get things implemented. Once that is done and estimated price, then see what the City can be done to get the money needed for the project.
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning? The City of Havelock Water Treatment Facility Improvements and Feasibility Study and the City of Havelock Water System Master Plan.
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: Trying to get the City to fund a new(redundant) well for backup in the event one of the others is needing repair work.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|