The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
Water System Name: |
Martin County Water and Sewer District 2 |
|
PWSID: |
60-59-009 |
Mailing Address: | P.O. Box 706 Williamston, NC 27892 | Ownership: | District |
|
Contact Person: | Robbie Whitaker | Title: | Martin County Water System Manager |
Phone: | 252-799-7310 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
Ductile Iron |
2-10 |
1.00 % |
Other |
2-10 |
1.00 % |
Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-10 |
98.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
Roanoke River (14-1) | 100 % |
|
County(s) | % of Service Population |
Martin | 100 % |
|
Water Use by Type
Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
Residential |
1,030 |
0.1100 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Commercial |
21 |
0.0039 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
28 |
0.0039 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0150 MGD
Water Sales
Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Williamston |
04-59-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0330 |
2046 |
No |
Yes |
8 |
Emergency |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
Jan |
0.1338 |
0.0340 |
May |
0.1677 |
0.2510 |
Sep |
0.1344 |
0.0970 |
Feb |
0.1480 |
0.1910 |
Jun |
0.1726 |
0.1770 |
Oct |
0.1311 |
0.1390 |
Mar |
0.1402 |
0.0320 |
Jul |
0.1632 |
0.1260 |
Nov |
0.1324 |
0.0000 |
Apr |
0.1921 |
0.0370 |
Aug |
0.1467 |
0.1860 |
Dec |
0.1327 |
0.0000 |
Combination of well and purchase water 
Ground Water Sources
Name or Number |
Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) |
Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
12-Hour Supply (MGD) |
CUA Reduction |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
MGD |
Days Used |
1 |
0.0828 |
64 |
0.2510 |
0.4320 |
CUA25 |
|
Emergency |
17 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0000 |
CUA0 |
|
Emergency |
2 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0720 |
CUA25 |
|
Emergency |
64 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0000 |
CUA0 |
|
Emergency |
BPS |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0000 |
CUA0 |
|
Emergency |
PC |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0000 |
CUA0 |
|
Emergency |
Ground Water Sources (continued)
Name or Number |
Well Depth (Feet) |
Casing Depth (Feet) |
Screen Depth (Feet) |
Well Diameter (Inches) |
Pump Intake Depth (Feet) |
Metered? |
Top |
Bottom |
1 |
453 |
|
400 |
439 |
12 |
|
Yes |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
2 |
307 |
|
248 |
302 |
6 |
|
Yes |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
BPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
PC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
Leaks and water plant interruptions required occasional use of Well 1 during much of the year. Water Purchases From Other Systems
Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
Martin County Regional Water and Sewer Authority |
60-59-015 |
0.1388 |
355 |
0.1500 |
2055 |
No |
Yes |
6-10 |
Regular |
Williamston |
04-59-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0330 |
2046 |
No |
Yes |
8 |
Emergency |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Jan |
0.0000 |
May |
0.0000 |
Sep |
0.0000 |
Feb |
0.0000 |
Jun |
0.0000 |
Oct |
0.0000 |
Mar |
0.0000 |
Jul |
0.0000 |
Nov |
0.0000 |
Apr |
0.0000 |
Aug |
0.0000 |
Dec |
0.0000 |

5. Planning
Projections
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Year-Round Population |
2,500 |
2,718 |
2,968 |
3,218 |
3,468 |
3,718 |
Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Residential |
0.1100 |
0.1042 |
0.1138 |
0.1234 |
0.1330 |
0.1426 |
Commercial |
0.0039 |
0.0027 |
0.0027 |
0.0027 |
0.0027 |
0.0027 |
Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Institutional |
0.0039 |
0.0036 |
0.0036 |
0.0036 |
0.0036 |
0.0036 |
System Process |
0.0150 |
0.0200 |
0.0200 |
0.0200 |
0.0200 |
0.0200 |
Unaccounted-for |
0.0163 |
0.0160 |
0.0172 |
0.0184 |
0.0196 |
0.0207 |
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
|
2024 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Ground Water Supply |
0.1260 |
0.1260 |
0.1260 |
0.1260 |
0.1260 |
0.1260 |
Purchases |
0.1500 |
0.1500 |
0.1500 |
0.1500 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Available Supply (MGD) |
0.2760 |
0.2760 |
0.2760 |
0.2760 |
0.1260 |
0.1260 |
Service Area Demand |
0.1491 |
0.1465 |
0.1573 |
0.1681 |
0.1789 |
0.1896 |
Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Total Demand (MGD) |
0.1491 |
0.1465 |
0.1573 |
0.1681 |
0.1789 |
0.1896 |
Demand as Percent of Supply |
54% |
53% |
57% |
61% |
142% |
150% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 44 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? MCWSD2 is a member entity of the Martin
County Regional Water and Sewer Authority. The MCRWASA WTP was designed for 2.0 MGD with an estimated average daily demand of 149,000 gpd for District 2. Contracted purchases are adjusted on July 1 of each year to match the "Full Water Requirements" of each member for the previous calendar year. Purchased water from the Martin County Regional Water and Sewer Authority is 132,200 gpd for FY 2021-22. Additional water may be contracted to be purchased as needed in future years. The WTP could be expanded to 6.0 MGD to meet future demands of the member entities. If this 149,000 gpd supply is added back into the projections for 2060 and 2070, then the projected 'Demand as Percent of Supply will decrease below 70%.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? Yes, Martin between the Town of Robersonville and the County Water Districts I and 2 are members System of the and Martin Regional Water and Sewer Authority, which constructed a transfer line interconnection and a Williamston and District 2, a new well in the District I area with a projected capacity of 350 gpm to supply Martin County Water District 1, (online in 2016). 2.0 MGD Surface Water Treatment Plant with withdrawal from the Roanoke River to supply water to Martin County Water District 2 (online 2016.0.139 MGD purchase agreement that can be increased as needed in future years).
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning? The Wooten Company completed the Martin County Water Resources Plan in March 2005, which addressed the future water needs of Martin County.
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|