|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
Marion |
|
PWSID: |
01-56-010 |
| Mailing Address: | P.O. Drawer 700 Marion, NC 28752 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Christopher Nanney | Title: | Water Treatment Plant Superintenden |
| Phone: | 828-652-2428 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Brant Sikes | | Phone: | 828-652-4224 |
| Mailing Address: | Po Drawer 700 Marion, NC 28752 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
4-10 |
3.00 % |
| Cast Iron |
4-16 |
35.00 % |
| Ductile Iron |
6-24 |
31.00 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
2 |
1.00 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-12 |
30.00 % |
Programs
Water production totals at the Water Treatment Plant are compared with water collection totals in the distribution system on a monthly basis. Total water used for filter backwashes, basin cleanings, known unmetered water and water used by the Waste Water Treatment Plant for feeding Cl2 and So2 are also calculated and accounted for on a monthly basis. When discrepancies are noted, Public Works is notified and a work order is created to locate and repair all detectable leaks. The City staff continue to analyze data and make repairs and improvements in our system to maximize efficiency. Water Conservation
Currently there are no systems close enough that are financially within reason.
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Catawba River (03-1) | 100 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| McDowell | 100 % |
|
The 2025 service-area population of 9,608 was estimated by adding the 2024 population (9,363) to the estimated increase in population (245) between 2024 and 2025. The increase of 245 was calculated by multiplying the increase in residential metered connections (100) by 2.45, the number of residents per connection in 2024. Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
3,818 |
0.4093 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
625 |
0.6273 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
27 |
0.0350 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.2960 MGD
Regarding the high amount of unaccounted-for-water (23% of supply) -- a major addition was made to the Nebo distribution system that purchases water from us. The master meter was supposed to be moved before the new lines went live but it wasn't. Consequently, the county was not being billed for the water used by this expansion and that water was not accounted for. The master meter has since been moved and although the county's purchasing contract doesn't expire for another year or so, early re-negotiations are currently underway. This problem was compounded by a couple of major leaks over the winter. One of these leaks went undiscovered for months as it was inside an old, derelict lumber mill whose fire protection system had frozen and busted. Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Nebo |
10-56-032 |
0.0764 |
366 |
0.2000 |
2027 |
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
1.6801 |
2.1850 |
May |
1.8081 |
2.7534 |
Sep |
1.9293 |
2.6891 |
| Feb |
1.6598 |
1.9170 |
Jun |
1.9166 |
2.7740 |
Oct |
1.9991 |
2.3781 |
| Mar |
1.6375 |
1.9350 |
Jul |
2.0909 |
2.4749 |
Nov |
2.0033 |
2.2969 |
| Apr |
1.7205 |
2.3600 |
Aug |
1.9657 |
2.2208 |
Dec |
2.0243 |
2.3404 |

Surface Water Sources
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
| Buck Creek |
Buck Creek Intake |
0.9792 |
366 |
1.4676 |
3.0000 |
F |
0.0000 |
| Clear Creek |
Clear Creek Intake |
0.2550 |
366 |
0.2550 |
0.4000 |
F |
0.0000 |
| Mackey Creek |
Mackey Creek Intake |
0.6378 |
366 |
0.6378 |
0.9000 |
F |
0.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| Buck Creek |
Buck Creek Intake |
26 |
Yes |
Catawba River (03-1) |
McDowell |
|
Regular |
| Clear Creek |
Clear Creek Intake |
1 |
Yes |
Catawba River (03-1) |
McDowell |
|
Regular |
| Mackey Creek |
Mackey Creek Intake |
3 |
Yes |
Catawba River (03-1) |
McDowell |
|
Regular |
During times of extreme drought Mackey and Clear Creek Intakes are bypassed as necessary to maintain minimum flow for the protection of downstream ecology. Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| Marion Water Treatment Plant |
4.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Mackey Creek, Clear Creek, Buck creek |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
1.1135 |
May |
0.9959 |
Sep |
0.9729 |
| Feb |
1.1576 |
Jun |
1.0230 |
Oct |
0.9186 |
| Mar |
0.9075 |
Jul |
1.0263 |
Nov |
0.8505 |
| Apr |
0.9360 |
Aug |
1.3209 |
Dec |
0.9113 |

The Corpening Creek WWTP is searching to secure grant funding for WWTP process repairs and improvements as well as collection system repairs and improvements per the AIA study conducted by Kimley-Horn. Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0031879 |
WWTP |
3.0000 |
3.0000 |
1.0111 |
3.7000 |
Youngs Fork |
Catawba River (03-1) |
| NCG590032 |
WTP |
0.0500 |
4.0000 |
0.0097 |
0.0490 |
Nicks Creek |
Catawba River (03-1) |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
9,608 |
9,500 |
9,595 |
9,690 |
9,790 |
9,885 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.4093 |
0.4655 |
0.4702 |
0.4749 |
0.4796 |
0.4844 |
| Commercial |
0.6273 |
0.6319 |
0.6365 |
0.6411 |
0.6475 |
0.6503 |
| Industrial |
0.0350 |
0.0355 |
0.0360 |
0.0365 |
0.0370 |
0.0375 |
| Institutional |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| System Process |
0.2960 |
0.2980 |
0.3000 |
0.3020 |
0.3040 |
0.3060 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.4329 |
0.4529 |
0.4567 |
0.4604 |
0.4647 |
0.4679 |
Unaccounted-for water figures are abnormally high potentially due to the expansion of the McDowell County, Nebo water distribution system that allowed for new connections prior to the master meter. The master meter has been relocated and the issue is resolved. Future Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Contract |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Year Begin |
Year End |
| Nebo |
10-56-032 |
0.2000 |
2009 |
2027 |
12 |
Regular |
The contract between the city and the county for the Nebo water system was originally established in 1995 and was last amended in 2009. Though the contract is set to expire in 2027, renegotiations are currently in process due to the expansion of the McDowell County Nebo water system. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
4.3000 |
| Service Area Demand |
1.8005 |
1.8838 |
1.8994 |
1.9149 |
1.9328 |
1.9461 |
| Sales |
0.0766 |
0.2000 |
0.2000 |
0.2000 |
0.2000 |
0.2000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
1.8771 |
2.0838 |
2.0994 |
2.1149 |
2.1328 |
2.1461 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
44% |
48% |
49% |
49% |
50% |
50% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 43 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
No Changes
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: The city of Marion is actively seeking funding for an AIA to be conducted this year(2026). This study would asses the overall condition of the treatment plant's systems and operations with a focus on potential improvements of the raw water intakes as well as any notable structural deficiencies of the treatment plant and its reservoirs.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|