|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
Lamplighter South/Danby |
|
PWSID: |
01-60-156 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 240908 Charlotte, NC 28224 | Ownership: | Business |
| |
| Contact Person: | Harshna Patel | Title: | Water Quality Coordinator |
| Phone: | 704-608-4674 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-8 |
100.00 % |
updated estimated total miles of water lines in the system. please note no new lines were installed this year. Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Catawba River (03-1) | 100 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Mecklenburg | 100 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
1,296 |
0.1636 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
7 |
0.0019 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0061 MGD
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.1840 |
0.2507 |
May |
0.1884 |
0.2274 |
Sep |
0.2006 |
0.2245 |
| Feb |
0.2393 |
0.4318 |
Jun |
0.2169 |
0.3203 |
Oct |
0.2002 |
0.2248 |
| Mar |
0.1786 |
0.2246 |
Jul |
0.2423 |
0.4111 |
Nov |
0.1804 |
0.2811 |
| Apr |
0.1803 |
0.2143 |
Aug |
0.1956 |
0.2624 |
Dec |
0.1902 |
0.2315 |

Ground Water Sources
| Name or Number |
Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) |
Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
12-Hour Supply (MGD) |
CUA Reduction |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| Well #1 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0 |
0.0000 |
|
2022 |
Emergency |
| Well #2 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0 |
0.0000 |
|
2022 |
Regular |
| Well #3 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0 |
0.0000 |
|
2022 |
Regular |
| Well #4 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0 |
0.0000 |
|
2022 |
Regular |
| Well #5 |
0.0162 |
308 |
0.0276 |
0.0470 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well #6 |
0.0108 |
312 |
0.0228 |
0.0170 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well #7 |
0.0477 |
358 |
0.0676 |
0.0630 |
|
|
Regular |
| Well #8 |
0.0310 |
354 |
0.0504 |
0.1300 |
|
|
Regular |
Ground Water Sources (continued)
| Name or Number |
Well Depth (Feet) |
Casing Depth (Feet) |
Screen Depth (Feet) |
Well Diameter (Inches) |
Pump Intake Depth (Feet) |
Metered? |
| Top |
Bottom |
| Well #1 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
234 |
Yes |
| Well #2 |
800 |
58 |
|
|
8 |
651 |
Yes |
| Well #3 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Yes |
| Well #4 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Yes |
| Well #5 |
1000 |
|
|
|
8 |
400 |
Yes |
| Well #6 |
900 |
|
|
|
8 |
760 |
Yes |
| Well #7 |
830 |
|
|
|
8 |
790 |
Yes |
| Well #8 |
760 |
54 |
|
|
8 |
400 |
Yes |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Lancaster County, SC |
29-20-001 |
0.1004 |
365 |
0.1100 |
2033 |
Yes |
Yes |
6 |
Regular |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.2160 |
May |
0.2120 |
Sep |
0.3050 |
| Feb |
0.2570 |
Jun |
0.2280 |
Oct |
0.2880 |
| Mar |
0.2110 |
Jul |
0.3110 |
Nov |
0.2760 |
| Apr |
0.2110 |
Aug |
0.3100 |
Dec |
0.2750 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| SC0030112 |
WWTP |
0.6300 |
0.6300 |
0.2583 |
0.5610 |
McAlpine Creek to Sugar Creek |
Catawba River (03-1) |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
3,167 |
3,170 |
3,172 |
3,175 |
3,177 |
3,180 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.1636 |
0.1680 |
0.1681 |
0.1683 |
0.1684 |
0.1685 |
| Commercial |
0.0019 |
0.0026 |
0.0034 |
0.0043 |
0.0053 |
0.0065 |
| Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| System Process |
0.0061 |
0.0060 |
0.0060 |
0.0060 |
0.0060 |
0.0060 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.0286 |
0.0195 |
0.0188 |
0.0179 |
0.0169 |
0.0157 |
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.2570 |
0.2570 |
0.2570 |
0.2570 |
0.2570 |
0.2570 |
| Purchases |
0.1100 |
0.1100 |
0.1100 |
0.1100 |
0.1100 |
0.1100 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
0.3670 |
0.3670 |
0.3670 |
0.3670 |
0.3670 |
0.3670 |
| Service Area Demand |
0.2002 |
0.1961 |
0.1963 |
0.1965 |
0.1966 |
0.1967 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
0.2002 |
0.1961 |
0.1963 |
0.1965 |
0.1966 |
0.1967 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
55% |
53% |
53% |
54% |
54% |
54% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 52 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
No Change
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? We will continue to promote water conservation via website and annual consumer confidence reporting. Ongoing Water Efficiency Rebate Program for Water Conservation. The installation of more water efficient home appliances and increased water conservation awareness should help in a reduction of future per capita usage.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? No future expansion of the water system is planned; however, should that occur, we may also be able to negotiate additional purchased water from Lancaster County.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? We would pursue engineering design and state approval for any changes to our water supply. None planned
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|