|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Provisional
| Water System Name: |
Monroe |
|
PWSID: |
01-90-010 |
| Mailing Address: | P.O. Box 69 Monroe, NC 28111 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | David Rankin | Title: | WTP Superintendent |
| Phone: | 704-282-4668 | Cell/Mobile: | 704-661-2131 |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Amy F. Cook, PE | | Phone: | 704-282-4604 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 69 Monroe, NC 28111 | Cell/Mobile: | 704-661-2131 |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
4-16 |
21.86 % |
| Cast Iron |
2-14 |
5.68 % |
| Ductile Iron |
2-30 |
19.14 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
2 |
0.22 % |
| Other |
6-12 |
0.40 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-12 |
52.70 % |
The City is in the process of "cleaning" duplicates in GIS. Thus, the total distribution pipe quantities are more accurate than previously reported. Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Rocky River (18-4) | 98 % |
| Catawba River (03-1) | 2 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Union | 100 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
13,770 |
2.2100 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
2,108 |
0.9800 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
52 |
2.6100 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
100 |
0.2700 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.7450 MGD
Industrial, institutional and commericial connections include industrial irrigation and fire line connections. Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Union County |
01-90-413 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
2120 |
Yes |
Yes |
8-16 |
Emergency |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
6.8400 |
8.1680 |
May |
7.5290 |
8.4810 |
Sep |
8.2220 |
9.5130 |
| Feb |
6.5360 |
7.9950 |
Jun |
7.8890 |
9.7780 |
Oct |
8.0850 |
10.5180 |
| Mar |
6.5850 |
7.5580 |
Jul |
8.4800 |
9.7420 |
Nov |
7.0070 |
8.6080 |
| Apr |
7.2080 |
8.6560 |
Aug |
7.6940 |
9.1890 |
Dec |
6.8910 |
7.9560 |

Surface Water Sources
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
| Richardson Creek |
Lake Lee and Monroe |
3.2000 |
74 |
0.0000 |
2.3000 |
SY50 |
690.0000 |
| Stewart Creek |
Lake Twitty |
7.0500 |
365 |
9.3720 |
7.1000 |
SY50 |
2,074.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| Richardson Creek |
Lake Lee and Monroe |
52 |
Yes |
Rocky River (18-4) |
Union |
|
Regular |
| Stewart Creek |
Lake Twitty |
34 |
Yes |
Rocky River (18-4) |
Union |
|
Regular |
Lake Monroe flows by gravity to Lake Lee. Pumps transfer water from Lake Lee to the head of Lake Twitty.
Within the year, the City of Monroe will be partnering with a consultant to perform a Source Water Supply Study. Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Union County |
01-90-413 |
0.3645 |
200 |
1.9900 |
2099 |
Yes |
No |
8-16 |
Regular |
Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| John Glenn WTP |
11.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Lakes Twitty, Lee, and Monroe |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
6.5470 |
May |
7.1690 |
Sep |
5.8900 |
| Feb |
8.2270 |
Jun |
6.2230 |
Oct |
6.0990 |
| Mar |
7.7090 |
Jul |
5.4320 |
Nov |
5.3600 |
| Apr |
6.1970 |
Aug |
8.9980 |
Dec |
5.7470 |

As previously indicated, the City is in the process of cleaning the GIS data. The number of sewer connections and septic systems is an estimate only.
Wastewater treatment plant expansion of 3 MGD (for future treatment capacity of 13.4 MGD) is planned for construction with the next 10 years. Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0024333 |
WWTP |
10.4000 |
10.4000 |
6.6330 |
15.0860 |
Richardson Creek |
Rocky River (18-4) |
| NC0080381 |
WTP |
0.9306 |
1.4000 |
0.7450 |
1.1620 |
Stewart Creek |
Rocky River (18-4) |
Wastewater Interconnections
| Water System |
PWSID |
Type |
Average Daily Amount |
Contract Maximum (MGD) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| Union County |
01-90-413 |
Receiving |
1.3700 |
365 |
2.6500 |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
40,040 |
44,209 |
53,890 |
65,692 |
80,078 |
97,614 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
2.2100 |
2.4400 |
2.9740 |
3.6260 |
4.4200 |
5.3880 |
| Commercial |
0.9800 |
1.0820 |
1.3190 |
1.6080 |
1.9600 |
2.3890 |
| Industrial |
2.6100 |
2.6760 |
2.8130 |
2.9570 |
3.1080 |
3.2670 |
| Institutional |
0.2700 |
0.2980 |
0.3630 |
0.4430 |
0.5400 |
0.6580 |
| System Process |
0.7450 |
0.8230 |
1.0030 |
1.2220 |
1.4900 |
1.8160 |
| Unaccounted-for |
1.0835 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Population projected to grow at 2% per year.
Residential, commercial and institutional water use projected at 2% annual growth.
Industrial water use projected at 0.5% annual growth. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
9.4000 |
9.4000 |
9.4000 |
9.4000 |
9.4000 |
9.4000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
1.9900 |
1.9900 |
1.9900 |
1.9900 |
1.9900 |
1.9900 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
11.3900 |
11.3900 |
11.3900 |
11.3900 |
11.3900 |
11.3900 |
| Service Area Demand |
7.8985 |
7.3190 |
8.4720 |
9.8560 |
11.5180 |
13.5180 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
7.8985 |
7.3190 |
8.4720 |
9.8560 |
11.5180 |
13.5180 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
69% |
64% |
74% |
87% |
101% |
119% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 55 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
No changes
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? The City is partnering with an engineering consultant to perform a comprehensive Source Water Supply Study to evaluate the capacity, reliabiity, resilience, regulatory feasibility, and long-term sustainability of the City's existing water supply assets and to identify and assess potential supplemental or alternative water sources capable of meeting current and projected demands.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? See previous note.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? See previous note.
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: The City is partnering with an engineering consultant to perform a comprehensive Source Water Supply Study to evaluate the capacity, reliabiity, resilience, regulatory feasibility, and long-term sustainability of the City's existing water supply assets and to identify and assess potential supplemental or alternative water sources capable of meeting current and projected demands.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|