|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
Union County |
|
PWSID: |
01-90-413 |
| Mailing Address: | 500 N. Main Street, Suite 500 Monroe, NC 28112 | Ownership: | County |
| |
| Contact Person: | Dominik Benedetto | Title: | Engineer |
| Phone: | 631-521-0141 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Aubrey Lofton | | Phone: | 704-296-4241 |
| Mailing Address: | Monroe, NC 28112 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
2-16 |
3.80 % |
| Cast Iron |
2-8 |
0.20 % |
| Ductile Iron |
2-42 |
27.39 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
2-10 |
0.08 % |
| Other |
2-54 |
2.96 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-16 |
65.57 % |
Programs
Hydrants are routinely flushed in isolated and dead-end areas at weekly to quarterly intervals depending on location. The County also initiates hydrant flushing in response to customer complaints about taste/odor, water line and valve repairs, when hydrant inspections from the fire department indicate a need, and any other time the water in the system is suspected to have been contaminated. Additionally, flushing takes place during yearly system disinfectant conversion for the entire system.
Only priority (critical) valves are exercised annually. All other valves are exercised every three years.
On August 1, 2022 (Effective Sept 1, 2022), UC Water's Cross Connection Control Program was adopted, allowing UC Water to require testing and inspect backflow prevention devices, implement an enforcement response plan, and issue penalties for violations.
The County is finishing up AMI deployment. All meters are being replaced or retrofitted depending on their age and condition to conform with the new standards.
Most residences in the County were built post-1980; this fact fulfills the general intent of a plumbing retrofit program.
Since adopting a Water Use Ordinance in 2015 (described under Water Conservation), the County has routinely communicated with customers through bill inserts, social media and email to ensure awareness of restricted water uses and noncompliance penalties. Tips for water conservation are also sent to customers frequently and made available online (www.unionconserves.com). We also conduct conservation outreach at community events and conduct water quality demonstrations at schools and plan to continue expanding such outreach efforts as opportunities become available and staffing allows.
The leak detection program has been suspended since only two leaks have been found in the entire county using acoustic leak detection. It isn’t feasible to continue the program at this time due to the cost and time we put into the program, yielding so few leaks. Water Conservation
The County began using an increasing block rate structure in 2001, and the structure changed to be highly punitive at usage >10,000 gal/month in 2008 in response to high usage during the drought of 2007-2009. The high charges above 10,000 gal/month has reduced usage at these tiers significantly since implementation.
On May 4, 2015, the Union County Board of Commissioners adopted a new Water Use Ordinance that limits spray irrigation to a maximum of 3 days per week, year round. The Ordinance also allows for additional water restrictions during times of water shortage including drought and system capacity limitations. The County educates customers about this Ordinance through bill inserts, social media, and participation in local events.
The County has implemented a new program to connect residents with professional irrigation contractors for residential irrigation efficiency evaluations. The program was launched in April 2023.
Many of the upcoming and proposed changes to Union County's programs are driven by our Yadkin River to Rocky River Interbasin Transfer Certificate. Specifically, revisions to our hydrant use and meter replacement programs as well as the new residential irrigation program address aspects of the conservation and drought management plans approved as part of the certificate.
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Catawba River (03-1) | 60 % |
| Rocky River (18-4) | 40 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Union | 100 % |
|
Year-round population is calculated as the number of non-zero residential accounts x 2.95 (Union County persons per household, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/unioncountynorthcarolina,US/PST045219)
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
61,158 |
10.0980 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
2,736 |
1.6300 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
52 |
0.8090 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
394 |
0.3350 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.2122 MGD
Union County meters all connections to the system, including temporary connections such as permitted hydrant use.
The County is in the process of revising its bulk water permit and temporary hydrant meter rental programs. The changes will improve cross connection control for authorized hydrant users and are expected to reduce apparent water losses by improving water use accounting for the permit program and reducing theft from hydrants. Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Chesterfield County Rural Water Company |
13-20-003 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.2880 |
|
Yes |
No |
6 |
Emergency |
| Lancaster County Water and Sewer District |
29-20-001 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
|
Yes |
No |
24,42 |
Emergency |
| Monroe |
01-90-010 |
0.3645 |
200 |
1.9900 |
|
Yes |
No |
8 |
Regular |
| Wingate |
01-90-030 |
0.3420 |
365 |
|
|
Yes |
Yes |
6,8 |
Regular |
Wingate's contract provides for all water required by the Town, with no maximum amount listed. Wingate is a co-applicant on Union County's IBT granting transfer from the Yadkin River Basin to the Rocky River Basin.
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
12.9100 |
15.0350 |
May |
13.4930 |
16.6930 |
Sep |
18.9930 |
23.3950 |
| Feb |
12.5980 |
14.4720 |
Jun |
16.6050 |
21.6030 |
Oct |
19.5450 |
22.6470 |
| Mar |
13.3800 |
15.2130 |
Jul |
18.6490 |
21.7980 |
Nov |
15.7610 |
18.7230 |
| Apr |
14.4470 |
17.0300 |
Aug |
15.7180 |
18.4510 |
Dec |
14.8580 |
16.8310 |

Surface Water Sources
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
| Pee Dee River |
Lake Tillery |
4.3590 |
365 |
9.1400 |
13.0000 |
T |
0.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| Pee Dee River |
Lake Tillery |
4,600 |
Yes |
Yadkin River (18-1) |
Stanly |
|
Regular |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Catawba River Water Supply Project |
29-20-002 |
11.2360 |
365 |
20.0000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
24,42 |
Regular |
| Charlotte Water |
01-60-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
|
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Emergency |
| Chesterfield County Rural Water Company |
13-20-003 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.2880 |
|
Yes |
No |
6 |
Emergency |
| Lancaster County Water and Sewer District |
29-20-001 |
1.1150 |
1 |
3.0000 |
2025 |
No |
No |
24,42 |
Regular |
| Monroe |
01-90-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
|
Yes |
No |
8-16 |
Emergency |
Union County shares ownership of the Catawba River Water Supply Project with Lancaster County Water and Sewer District in South Carolina. In 2021, each owner received 20 MGD of the plant's 40 MGD rated capacity. In 2012, Union County leased an additional 3 MGD from Lancaster County Water and Sewer District in an agreement that has been amended to expire June 30, 2025. Union County only considers this leased capacity used when the County's own 20 MGD capacity is exceeded. Since the Yadkin River Water Treatment Plant came online in February 2024 and the delay in the project was the purpose of the latest amendment with LCWSD, it is not anticipated that we will be using the leased capacity before its expiration and it will not be renewed after expiration. Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| Catawba River WTP (1/2 Union) |
40.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Catawba River |
| Yadkin WTP |
13.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Pee Dee River |
The County has received an IBT Certificate for a new water supply from Lake Tillery on the Yadkin River in May 2017. The new water treatment plant came online in February 2024.
The capacity at the Catawba River Water Treatment Plant was successfully expanded from 36mgd to 40mgd in 2021. The County and its Joint Venture partner LCWSD intend to expand the facility again in 2030.
The County also has a Water Use Ordinance that can be implemented during capacity constraints if needed.
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
9.5680 |
May |
10.3250 |
Sep |
9.2570 |
| Feb |
10.7500 |
Jun |
10.4040 |
Oct |
8.5410 |
| Mar |
10.4810 |
Jul |
8.9830 |
Nov |
8.9070 |
| Apr |
9.7800 |
Aug |
11.2260 |
Dec |
6.7810 |

Construction on the Grassy Branch WRF commenced in September 2024 and is scheduled to be complete in May 2026. Capacity for Grassy Branch WRF will increase from 0.05 MGD to 0.12 MGD per the negotiated Special Order of Consent. Construction on the 12 Mile Creek WRF commenced in January 2025 and is scheduled to be complete in September 2027. Capacity for 12 Mile Creek WRF will increase from 7.5MGD to 9.0 MGD. Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0069523 |
WWTP |
0.0500 |
0.0500 |
0.0220 |
0.1390 |
Clear Creek |
Rocky River (18-4) |
| NC0069841 |
WWTP |
1.9000 |
1.9000 |
1.1840 |
2.4720 |
North Fork Crooked Creek |
Rocky River (18-4) |
| NC0085359 |
WWTP |
12.0000 |
7.5000 |
5.2450 |
9.6000 |
Twelve Mile Creek |
Catawba River (03-1) |
| NC0085812 |
WWTP |
0.0500 |
0.0500 |
0.0410 |
0.2070 |
Crooked Creek |
Rocky River (18-4) |
Construction commenced January 2025 for the expansion of Twelve Mile Creek WRF to 9MGD capacity. Scheduled to be completed September 2027.
Union County worked with the state on design and constraints for Special Orders by Consent (SOC) related to ongoing inflow and infiltration issues leading to exceeded capacity on permit NC0085812 (Grassy Branch WRF). The SOC was approved by Union County Board of County Commissioners on April 4th, 2022. Construction began September 2024 to expand Grassy Branch WRF capacity from 0.05 MGD to 0.12 MGD. Scheduled to be completed May 2026.
Union County also has a land application system at the Olde Sycamore WRF, permit number WQ0011928. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.150MGD, with the AADD measuring 0.039MGD and the MDD measuring 0.092MGD for 2025. Wastewater Interconnections
| Water System |
PWSID |
Type |
Average Daily Amount |
Contract Maximum (MGD) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| Charlotte Water |
01-60-010 |
Discharging |
1.8520 |
365 |
3.0000 |
| Lancaster County, S.C. |
29-20-001 |
Discharging |
0.0110 |
365 |
0.0250 |
| Monroe |
01-90-010 |
Discharging |
1.3690 |
365 |
2.6500 |
| Marshville |
01-90-015 |
Receiving |
0.2020 |
365 |
0.3760 |
| Wingate |
01-90-030 |
Receiving |
0.2300 |
365 |
0.7500 |
On April 12, 1996, Union County and the City of Charlotte entered into an agreement for Charlotte to provide up to 3 million gallons of allocated wastewater capacity to the County from the McAlpine Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. This contract is perpetual in duration.
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
161,865 |
183,364 |
212,063 |
248,500 |
290,165 |
345,515 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
10.0980 |
12.8360 |
14.8440 |
17.3950 |
20.3120 |
24.1860 |
| Commercial |
1.6300 |
1.8740 |
2.7960 |
3.9780 |
5.6310 |
6.8650 |
| Industrial |
0.8090 |
1.3540 |
2.1250 |
2.9290 |
4.0360 |
4.9200 |
| Institutional |
0.3350 |
0.4160 |
0.5590 |
0.7230 |
1.0320 |
1.2590 |
| System Process |
0.2122 |
1.1450 |
1.5380 |
1.9890 |
2.5810 |
3.1460 |
| Unaccounted-for |
1.9722 |
2.4831 |
3.0801 |
3.8059 |
4.7327 |
5.6885 |
The population projections were originally developed in the Comprehensive Water & Wastewater Master Plan (CWWMP), December 2011. These projections were updated during the Yadkin River Water Supply Project Inter-Basin Transfer permitting process in 2013 for the certificate granted in May 2017 and to differentiate between customers in each river basin. Union County's 2024 CWWMP is complete and the numbers have been included.
For the Catawba River Basin customers, the following population and water use annual growth rates were used: 2021-2070 (2.0%)
For the Yadkin River Basin customers, the following population and water use annual growth rates were used: 2013-2030 (3.7%); 2031-2040 (3.4%); 2041-2070 (2.8%) Future Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Contract |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Year Begin |
Year End |
| Wingate |
01-90-030 |
0.0000 |
2030 |
|
6,8 |
Regular |
| Wingate |
01-90-030 |
0.0000 |
2040 |
|
6,8 |
Regular |
| Wingate |
01-90-030 |
0.0000 |
2050 |
|
6,8 |
Regular |
| Wingate |
01-90-030 |
0.0000 |
2060 |
|
6,8 |
Regular |
| Wingate |
01-90-030 |
0.0000 |
2070 |
|
6,8 |
Regular |
Future Supply Sources
| Source Name |
PWSID |
Source Type |
Additional Supply |
Year Online |
Year Offline |
Type |
| Catawba River WTP |
29-20-002 |
Surface |
8.0000 |
2030 |
|
Regular |
| Catawba River WTP |
29-20-002 |
Surface |
8.0000 |
2039 |
|
Regular |
| Yadkin River |
01-90-413 |
Surface |
12.0000 |
2032 |
|
Regular |
| Yadkin River |
01-90-413 |
Surface |
4.0000 |
2044 |
|
Regular |
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
13.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
23.0000 |
20.0000 |
20.0000 |
20.0000 |
20.0000 |
20.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
8.0000 |
28.0000 |
32.0000 |
32.0000 |
32.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
36.0000 |
41.0000 |
61.0000 |
65.0000 |
65.0000 |
65.0000 |
| Service Area Demand |
15.0564 |
20.1081 |
24.9421 |
30.8199 |
38.3247 |
46.0645 |
| Sales |
0.5417 |
2.3320 |
2.3320 |
2.3320 |
2.3320 |
2.3320 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
15.5981 |
22.4401 |
27.2741 |
33.1519 |
40.6567 |
48.3965 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
43% |
55% |
45% |
51% |
63% |
74% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 62 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Union County utilizes an increasing block rate structure. Future per capita demands will be evaluated annually and addressed as needed. Union County's 2024 Comprehensive Water and Wastewater Master Plan is complete and population projections have been updated.
In Spring 2017, Union County initiated a new water conservation messaging campaign to target customers through regular bill inserts, social media, and website education to reduce per capita water consumption.
The County is currently implementing an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) program and new customer portal to give customers near real-time access to usage and leak alerts.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? On May 4, 2015 the Board of County Commissioners adopted a Water Use Ordinance that limits spray irrigation to a maximum of 3 days per week year round and allows increased restrictions in response to drought or approaching available treatment capacity. This is to help bring down the peaking factor and push out when new supply is needed.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning?
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|