|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Provisional
| Water System Name: |
Burlington |
|
PWSID: |
02-01-010 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 1358 Burlington, NC 27216-1358 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Robert Patterson | Title: | Water Resources Director |
| Phone: | 336-222-5021 | Cell/Mobile: | 336-516-2255 |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Benjamin Bani | | Phone: | 336-222-5133 |
| Mailing Address: | PO. Box 1358 Burlington, NC 27216-1358 | Cell/Mobile: | 336-516-2255 |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Cast Iron |
4-36 |
9.06 % |
| Ductile Iron |
4-36 |
52.51 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
2 |
0.10 % |
| Other |
2-36 |
38.33 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Haw River (02-1) | 100 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Alamance | 99 % |
| Guilford | 1 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
25,105 |
2.9176 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
1,801 |
3.3436 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 2.1220 MGD
Currently, the City of Burlington water system only distinguished between residential and commercial water meters. New billing software may allow sub-classifying commercial establishments. In addition to the 25105 residential and 1801 commercial meters, there 28 bulk master meters serving the adjacent municipalities. Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| City of Graham |
02-01-015 |
3.3993 |
13 |
0.0000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
8, 12 |
Emergency |
| City of Greensboro |
02-41-010 |
1.9446 |
365 |
5.0000 |
2028 |
Yes |
Yes |
24 |
Regular |
| Ossipee SD |
02-01-123 |
0.0517 |
365 |
0.1000 |
2035 |
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
| Town of Elon |
02-01-025 |
0.6528 |
365 |
1.6000 |
2027 |
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
| Town of Gibsonville |
02-41-025 |
0.6221 |
365 |
2.5000 |
2030 |
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
| Town of Haw River |
02-01-020 |
0.7342 |
365 |
1.5000 |
2018 |
Yes |
Yes |
10,10 |
Regular |
| Village of Alamance |
02-01-035 |
0.0661 |
365 |
0.5000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
8, 8 |
Regular |
| Whitsett |
30-41-089 |
0.0020 |
365 |
0.5000 |
2025 |
Yes |
Yes |
8 |
Regular |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
14.4292 |
18.3329 |
May |
14.3964 |
17.6770 |
Sep |
15.2472 |
18.7970 |
| Feb |
13.4873 |
15.3803 |
Jun |
14.7614 |
16.9453 |
Oct |
15.6021 |
19.5546 |
| Mar |
13.0658 |
15.5219 |
Jul |
16.1011 |
21.2016 |
Nov |
14.8113 |
17.5048 |
| Apr |
14.0413 |
18.5558 |
Aug |
15.2018 |
18.3570 |
Dec |
14.4007 |
16.3306 |

Surface Water Sources
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
| Great Alamance Creek |
Lake Mackintosh |
8.5451 |
365 |
14.2740 |
35.6000 |
SY50 |
5,141.0000 |
| Stoney Creek |
Stoney Creek Reservoir |
6.1070 |
364 |
11.6240 |
14.6000 |
SY50 |
2,450.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| Great Alamance Creek |
Lake Mackintosh |
135 |
Yes |
Haw River (02-1) |
Alamance |
|
Regular |
| Stoney Creek |
Stoney Creek Reservoir |
95 |
Yes |
Haw River (02-1) |
Alamance |
|
Regular |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| City of Graham |
02-01-015 |
0.0019 |
365 |
0.0000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
8, 12 |
Regular |
Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| Ed Thomas WTP |
16.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Stoney Creek Reservoir |
| J. D. Mackintosh, Jr WTP |
18.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Lake Mackintosh |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
11.6834 |
May |
12.2907 |
Sep |
10.9421 |
| Feb |
15.3146 |
Jun |
12.0672 |
Oct |
10.5073 |
| Mar |
11.5710 |
Jul |
16.4871 |
Nov |
9.8051 |
| Apr |
12.4101 |
Aug |
12.7339 |
Dec |
10.0208 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0023868 |
WWTP |
12.0000 |
12.0000 |
4.6851 |
12.3980 |
Haw River |
Haw River (02-1) |
| NC0023876 |
WWTP |
12.0000 |
12.0000 |
7.1423 |
25.2450 |
Great Alamance Creek |
Haw River (02-1) |
| NCG590013 |
WTP |
0.0000 |
0.7500 |
0.3088 |
0.6816 |
Great Alamance Creek |
Haw River (02-1) |
Wastewater Interconnections
| Water System |
PWSID |
Type |
Average Daily Amount |
Contract Maximum (MGD) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| City of Graham |
02-01-015 |
Discharging |
0.0012 |
365 |
|
| City of Greensboro |
02-41-010 |
Discharging |
0.2177 |
365 |
|
| City of Graham |
02-01-015 |
Receiving |
0.1879 |
365 |
0.5000 |
| Green Level |
02-01-030 |
Receiving |
0.0948 |
365 |
0.2500 |
| Town of Elon |
02-01-025 |
Receiving |
0.6894 |
365 |
1.6000 |
| Town of Gibsonville |
02-41-025 |
Receiving |
0.7783 |
365 |
1.5500 |
| Town of Haw River |
02-01-020 |
Receiving |
0.3241 |
365 |
1.0000 |
| Town of Swepsonville |
30-01-005 |
Receiving |
0.2275 |
365 |
0.8000 |
| Village of Alamance |
02-01-035 |
Receiving |
0.0530 |
365 |
0.1440 |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
62,300 |
66,340 |
74,800 |
83,400 |
91,600 |
100,500 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
2.9176 |
3.1250 |
3.3500 |
3.5200 |
3.7300 |
3.8400 |
| Commercial |
3.3436 |
3.5500 |
3.7700 |
3.8800 |
3.9400 |
4.0200 |
| Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| System Process |
2.1220 |
1.9400 |
2.0200 |
2.0800 |
2.1000 |
2.3000 |
| Unaccounted-for |
2.0595 |
2.3100 |
2.3600 |
2.5200 |
2.6370 |
2.6860 |
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
50.2000 |
50.2000 |
50.2000 |
50.2000 |
50.2000 |
50.2000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
0.0019 |
0.0019 |
0.0019 |
0.0019 |
0.0019 |
0.0019 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
50.2019 |
50.2019 |
50.2019 |
50.2019 |
50.2019 |
50.2019 |
| Service Area Demand |
10.4427 |
10.9250 |
11.5000 |
12.0000 |
12.4070 |
12.8460 |
| Sales |
4.1946 |
11.7000 |
11.7000 |
11.7000 |
11.7000 |
11.7000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
14.6373 |
22.6250 |
23.2000 |
23.7000 |
24.1070 |
24.5460 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
29% |
45% |
46% |
47% |
48% |
49% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 47 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: The City is working with engineering firms to develop treatment and remediation solutions for the emerging contaminants, namely per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances known as PFAS found in its water sources.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|