|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Provisional
| Water System Name: |
Greensboro |
|
PWSID: |
02-41-010 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 3136 Greensboro, NC 27402 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Scott Jewell | Title: | Water Supply Manager |
| Phone: | 336-373-7900 | Cell/Mobile: | 336-430-6550 |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Earl Green | | Phone: | 336-373-7909 |
| Mailing Address: | 1041 Battleground Ave Greensboro, NC 27408 | Cell/Mobile: | 336-430-6550 |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Cast Iron |
1-42 |
34.50 % |
| Ductile Iron |
2-60 |
60.87 % |
| Other |
.7-48 |
2.76 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
.7-12 |
1.87 % |
The estimated total miles of water lines do not include privately owned water lines (estimated 369 miles).
The City of Greensboro has replaced the majority of the water meters in its system in the past 5 years. There still exist a few old meters in the system but their age is not a fair representation of the meter age distribution. The average age of Greensboro meters is approximately 6 years old. Programs
Our current leak detection program is mostly focus on detecting leaks being reported. Greensboro plans to improve the program to make it a more proactive program and integrated into its non-revenue water program. The goal is to use a combination of technology such as DMAs, machine learning based on pipe scoring factors, and satellite leak detection to help target water mains for repair/replacement and reduce real loss. Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Haw River (02-1) | 93 % |
| Deep River (02-2) | 7 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Guilford | 100 % |
|
The year around population served comprises the estimated population of the City of Greensboro and the estimated population outside city limit in Guilford County. The estimated population of Greensboro resulted from projection based on 2010-2024 populations estimates data from the Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM). The estimated population outside city limit is calculated based on the number of water service connections outside city limit and the average number of persons served per water service connection. Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
101,351 |
16.7100 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
9,144 |
9.5400 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
51 |
1.7400 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
290 |
0.7900 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 2.5600 MGD
The amount of water used for system processes includes water used for backwash at the City's both water treatment plants, flushing in the distribution system for water quality purposes and for the City's Fire Department routine maintenance, water tank servicing, and water lines cleaning. Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| City of Burlington |
02-01-010 |
0.0044 |
119 |
|
2028 |
Yes |
Yes |
12,16 |
Emergency |
| City of Reidsville |
02-79-020 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
2029 |
No |
Yes |
30 |
Emergency |
| Town of Jamestown |
02-41-030 |
0.1055 |
365 |
0.1250 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
Jamestown purchases water from PTRWA (allocation of 0.775 MGD) via the distribution lines of High Point and Greensboro. Jamestown is obligated to purchase or pay for 0.500 MGD from PTRWA, and this amount is included in the 2.780 MGD (2.28 MGD firm allocation for High Point + 0.5 MGD for Jamestown) sales contract with High Point. Jamestown routes 0.125 MGD through Greensboro, and this amount is included in the 7.9355 MGD sales contract with Greensboro (7.83 MGD + 0.125 MGD). 7.83 MGD is the firm allocation for Greensboro and 0.125 MGD is additional water for Jamestown above the firm allocation or requested amount, whichever is greater.
The Jamestown contract value (0.15 MGD) is the difference between the allocated amount (0.775 MGD) and the sum of the obligated contract amount (0.500 MGD), and water routed through Greensboro (0.125 MGD).
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
34.1437 |
44.9818 |
May |
33.2448 |
36.0752 |
Sep |
37.0835 |
42.4204 |
| Feb |
31.6439 |
34.9362 |
Jun |
34.4767 |
42.0787 |
Oct |
34.9009 |
37.1838 |
| Mar |
31.9606 |
37.0230 |
Jul |
34.7225 |
37.8292 |
Nov |
32.6855 |
38.0155 |
| Apr |
33.0631 |
36.9822 |
Aug |
35.3645 |
39.7234 |
Dec |
30.9872 |
33.7507 |

Surface Water Sources
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
| Brush Creek. |
Lake Higgins |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
SY50 |
768.0000 |
| Reedy Fork Cr. |
Lake Townsend |
16.2522 |
365 |
20.7660 |
28.2000 |
SY50 |
6,304.0000 |
| Reedy Fork Cr.Horsepen Cr. |
Lake Brandt |
8.4465 |
365 |
14.8700 |
12.0000 |
SY50 |
1,930.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| Brush Creek. |
Lake Higgins |
11 |
No |
Haw River (02-1) |
Guilford |
2018 |
Emergency |
| Reedy Fork Cr. |
Lake Townsend |
59 |
Yes |
Haw River (02-1) |
Guilford |
|
Regular |
| Reedy Fork Cr.Horsepen Cr. |
Lake Brandt |
35 |
Yes |
Haw River (02-1) |
Guilford |
|
Regular |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| City of Burlington |
02-01-010 |
1.9446 |
365 |
5.0000 |
2028 |
Yes |
Yes |
12,16 |
Regular |
| City of High Point |
02-41-020 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
|
Yes |
Yes |
12,12 |
Emergency |
| City of Reidsville |
02-79-020 |
0.9920 |
365 |
1.0000 |
2029 |
Yes |
Yes |
30 |
Regular |
| City of Winston-Salem |
02-34-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
3.0000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Emergency |
| Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority |
30-76-010 |
6.7714 |
365 |
7.9550 |
2066 |
Yes |
Yes |
48 |
Regular |
PTRWA contract amount is set to increase so that Greensboro can meet future water needs. Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| Lake Townsend WTP |
30.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Haw River Basin-Reedy Fork Creek |
| Mitchell Water Treatment Plant |
24.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Haw River Basin-Reedy Fork Creek |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
33.2500 |
May |
36.6100 |
Sep |
32.5000 |
| Feb |
39.2700 |
Jun |
37.2700 |
Oct |
31.9400 |
| Mar |
34.4300 |
Jul |
39.7600 |
Nov |
30.5700 |
| Apr |
35.2400 |
Aug |
34.0900 |
Dec |
30.8700 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0047384 |
WWTP |
56.0000 |
56.0000 |
34.6200 |
71.1100 |
South Buffalo Creek |
Haw River (02-1) |
| NC0081426 |
WTP |
0.0000 |
24.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
North Buffalo Creek |
Haw River (02-1) |
| NCG590017 |
WTP |
2.0000 |
32.0000 |
0.3044 |
1.9400 |
Reedy Fork Cr. |
Haw River (02-1) |
Wastewater Interconnections
| Water System |
PWSID |
Type |
Average Daily Amount |
Contract Maximum (MGD) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| City of High Point |
02-41-020 |
Discharging |
0.1730 |
365 |
|
| Town of Jamestown |
02-41-030 |
Discharging |
0.4668 |
365 |
|
| City of Burlington |
02-01-010 |
Receiving |
0.2180 |
365 |
0.9000 |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
330,632 |
349,184 |
382,790 |
419,630 |
460,015 |
504,287 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
16.7100 |
17.2321 |
20.2584 |
23.1969 |
26.0486 |
28.8785 |
| Commercial |
9.5400 |
9.8381 |
11.5658 |
13.2435 |
14.8715 |
16.4872 |
| Industrial |
1.7400 |
1.7944 |
2.1095 |
2.4155 |
2.7124 |
3.0071 |
| Institutional |
0.7900 |
0.8147 |
0.9578 |
1.0967 |
1.2315 |
1.3653 |
| System Process |
2.5600 |
3.5600 |
3.5600 |
3.5600 |
3.5600 |
3.5600 |
| Unaccounted-for |
2.9598 |
3.7100 |
3.8000 |
4.0400 |
4.4300 |
4.8500 |
Future Supply Sources
| Source Name |
PWSID |
Source Type |
Additional Supply |
Year Online |
Year Offline |
Type |
| City of Burlington |
02-01-010 |
Purchase |
1.8000 |
2030 |
|
Regular |
| City of Reidsville |
02-79-020 |
Purchase |
4.0000 |
2040 |
|
Regular |
| PTRWA |
36-76-010 |
Purchase |
1.5710 |
2030 |
|
Regular |
| PTRWA |
36-76-010 |
Purchase |
8.9130 |
2040 |
|
Regular |
| PTRWA |
36-76-010 |
Purchase |
0.0000 |
2050 |
|
Regular |
| PTRWA |
36-76-010 |
Purchase |
7.1800 |
2060 |
|
Regular |
The City of Greensboro plans to increase its water purchases from PTRWA to 18.32 MGD by 2040 and 25.5 MGD by 2060. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
40.2000 |
40.2000 |
40.2000 |
40.2000 |
40.2000 |
40.2000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
13.9550 |
13.9550 |
13.9550 |
13.9550 |
13.9550 |
13.9550 |
| Future Supplies |
3.3710 |
16.2840 |
16.2840 |
23.4640 |
23.4640 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
54.1550 |
57.5260 |
70.4390 |
70.4390 |
77.6190 |
77.6190 |
| Service Area Demand |
34.2998 |
36.9493 |
42.2515 |
47.5526 |
52.8540 |
58.1481 |
| Sales |
0.1069 |
0.1294 |
0.1294 |
0.1294 |
0.1294 |
0.1294 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
34.4067 |
37.0787 |
42.3809 |
47.6820 |
52.9834 |
58.2775 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
64% |
64% |
60% |
68% |
68% |
75% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 51 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
The City of Greensboro conducts a water audit every year and has completed a non-revenue water analysis in which mid-term and long-term non-revenue water (NRW) targets were established.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? The City of Greensboro conducts water supply meter testing on a regular basis to ensure supply flow accuracy. Additionally, the City will be developing DMAs and using leak detection technology to identify real loss areas and reduce non-revenue water.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? No other supplies than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered at this stage.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? Mitchell Water Treatment Plant is undergoing improvements for hydraulic efficiency. The City of Greensboro has a public education program that encourages the public to conserve water.
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? Yes, The City of Greensboro is participating in regional water supply planning through partnership with neighboring water systems including the Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority (PTRWA), City of Burlington, City of High Point, City of Reidsville, and the City of Winston-Salem.
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning? The following major studies were used for planning:
- 2025 Safe Yield Study and 2024 Water Master Plan carried out by Hazen and Sawyer.
- 2025 Non-Revenue Water Analysis developed by Cavanaugh.
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues: The City currently has two advanced treatment projects planned for Mitchell WTP and Townsend WTP to address emerging contaminants. It is anticipated that these projects will start construction in 2026 and both projects will install GAC facilities. Mitchell WTP will also start construction on residual management improvements in 2026.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|