|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Provisional
| Water System Name: |
Pittsboro |
|
PWSID: |
03-19-015 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 3729 Sanford, NC 27331 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Jason Bertoncino | Title: | Director of Engineering |
| Phone: | 919-777-1155 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Paul Weeks | | Phone: | 919-777-1119 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 3729 Sanford, NC 27331 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
6-10 |
0.10 % |
| Cast Iron |
6-8 |
8.70 % |
| Ductile Iron |
6-16 |
35.10 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
2 |
6.80 % |
| Other |
2-8 |
26.60 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-12 |
22.70 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
No, infrastructure connections from the merger with City of Sanford to TriRiver Water are under design and expected online in the near-term.
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Haw River (02-1) | 100 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Chatham | 100 % |
|
The Town of Pittsboro merged utilities with the City of Sanford on July 1, 2024 to form TriRiver Water. Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
2,641 |
0.2755 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
483 |
0.2185 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
5 |
0.2630 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.1469 MGD
Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Chapel Ridge S/D |
40-19-009 |
0.1356 |
365 |
0.0000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
12 |
Regular |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.8620 |
1.0400 |
May |
0.8890 |
1.0900 |
Sep |
0.9790 |
1.6100 |
| Feb |
0.8100 |
1.1600 |
Jun |
0.8650 |
1.0000 |
Oct |
0.8680 |
1.1500 |
| Mar |
0.8390 |
1.0100 |
Jul |
0.9100 |
1.0800 |
Nov |
0.7700 |
0.9570 |
| Apr |
0.8910 |
1.0800 |
Aug |
0.8970 |
1.1000 |
Dec |
0.7510 |
0.8650 |

Surface Water Sources
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
| Haw River |
|
1.0969 |
365 |
0.0000 |
2.0000 |
T |
0.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| Haw River |
|
1,275 |
Yes |
Haw River (02-1) |
Chatham |
|
Regular |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Chatham County |
03-19-126 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.5000 |
|
Yes |
Yes |
8 |
Emergency |
Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| Town of Pittsboro WTP |
2.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Haw River |
The Town of Pittsboro merged utilities with the City of Sanford on July 1, 2024 to form TriRiver Water. Long-term options for interconnectivity are being explored to meet future demands.
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.5190 |
May |
0.7420 |
Sep |
0.4690 |
| Feb |
0.6510 |
Jun |
0.5590 |
Oct |
0.4850 |
| Mar |
0.6110 |
Jul |
0.5850 |
Nov |
0.5080 |
| Apr |
0.5710 |
Aug |
0.5870 |
Dec |
0.5430 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0020354 |
WWTP |
3.2200 |
0.7500 |
0.5100 |
1.4350 |
Roberson Creek |
Haw River (02-1) |
| WQ0020019 |
WWTP |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.1650 |
0.1920 |
Various - sludge |
Haw River (02-1) |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
6,493 |
20,609 |
51,522 |
61,826 |
74,191 |
85,150 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.2755 |
2.5000 |
4.3500 |
6.1800 |
7.1700 |
8.1700 |
| Commercial |
0.2185 |
0.8400 |
1.4700 |
2.0900 |
2.4300 |
2.7600 |
| Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0.2630 |
0.0500 |
0.0800 |
0.1200 |
0.1400 |
0.1600 |
| System Process |
0.1469 |
0.5600 |
0.9700 |
1.3800 |
1.6000 |
1.8200 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.0574 |
0.2100 |
0.3600 |
0.5100 |
0.6000 |
0.6800 |
Demand projections were developed under regional utility master planning studies for Pittsboro by TriRiver Water. Average day raw water demands are shown. Demands shown include Chatham Park. Future Supply Sources
| Source Name |
PWSID |
Source Type |
Additional Supply |
Year Online |
Year Offline |
Type |
| Sanford |
03-53-010 |
Surface |
4.0000 |
2030 |
|
Regular |
| Sanford |
03-53-010 |
Surface |
4.0000 |
2040 |
|
Regular |
| Sanford |
03-53-010 |
Surface |
6.0000 |
2050 |
|
Regular |
TriRiver Water is conducting ongoing planning efforts to identify future water treatment facilities. This data assumes that the Sanford Water Plant will continue to expand as needed to provide water supply to Pittsboro. Regional planning efforts are still ongoing and future supply sources are subject to change. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
2.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Supplies |
4.0000 |
8.0000 |
14.0000 |
14.0000 |
14.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
2.0000 |
6.0000 |
10.0000 |
16.0000 |
16.0000 |
16.0000 |
| Service Area Demand |
0.9613 |
4.1600 |
7.2300 |
10.2800 |
11.9400 |
13.5900 |
| Sales |
0.1356 |
0.1356 |
0.1356 |
0.1356 |
0.1356 |
0.1356 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
1.0969 |
4.2956 |
7.3656 |
10.4156 |
12.0756 |
13.7256 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
55% |
72% |
74% |
65% |
75% |
86% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 42 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
The Town of Pittsboro merged utilities with the City of Sanford on July 1, 2024. TriRiver Water's planning efforts and utility management should adequately address the capacity and management issues faced in the future.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? TriRiver Water's regional planning efforts should adequately address demand management practices in the future.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? TriRiver water is conducting ongoing planning efforts to identify water treatment facilities. Timing, location, and capacity of future water treatment facilities are being evaluated under ongoing planning efforts.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? TriRiver Water's merger should standardize the technical assistance, funding, and permitting across Pittsboro, Sanford, Siler City, and Chatham County to address demand management and supply planning.
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? Yes, Yes, TriRiver Water has engaged in regional utility master planning studies that are ongoing.
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|