|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
Elizabeth City |
|
PWSID: |
04-70-010 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 347 Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Gregory Colvin | Title: | Water Treatment Plant Supt. |
| Phone: | 252-337-6647 | Cell/Mobile: | 252-333-2540 |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | Dwan Bell | | Phone: | 252-337-6628 |
| Mailing Address: | PO Box 347 Elizabeth City, NC 27907-0347 | Cell/Mobile: | 252-333-2540 |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
6-8 |
1.40 % |
| Cast Iron |
4,-12 |
20.00 % |
| Ductile Iron |
4-20 |
3.47 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
2 |
0.13 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
2-20 |
75.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Albemarle Sound (12-1) | 100 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Pasquotank | 100 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
7,411 |
0.7674 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
1,160 |
0.6402 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
16 |
0.0088 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
90 |
0.0496 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.3279 MGD
Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Pasquotank County R.O |
60-70-000 |
0.0016 |
365 |
|
|
No |
Yes |
24 |
Regular |
| Pasquotank County Water |
04-70-015 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
|
No |
Yes |
8 |
Emergency |
| South Camden W & S District |
04-15-015 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
|
No |
Yes |
6 |
Emergency |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
2.3388 |
|
May |
2.4670 |
|
Sep |
2.6033 |
|
| Feb |
2.3857 |
|
Jun |
2.5867 |
|
Oct |
2.6097 |
|
| Mar |
2.4032 |
|
Jul |
2.6419 |
|
Nov |
2.5833 |
|
| Apr |
2.4533 |
|
Aug |
2.5968 |
|
Dec |
2.5935 |
|
Monthly numbers are based on GPWMOR reports

Ground Water Sources
| Name or Number |
Average Daily Withdrawal (MGD) |
Max Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
12-Hour Supply (MGD) |
CUA Reduction |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| 01 |
0.1678 |
365 |
|
0.2160 |
|
|
Regular |
| 02 |
0.1876 |
365 |
|
0.1440 |
|
|
Regular |
| 03 |
0.1545 |
365 |
|
0.2880 |
|
|
Regular |
| 04 |
0.1904 |
365 |
|
0.2398 |
|
|
Regular |
| 05 |
0.1421 |
365 |
|
0.0360 |
|
|
Regular |
| 07 |
0.0732 |
365 |
|
0.0720 |
|
|
Regular |
| 08 |
0.1920 |
365 |
|
0.2880 |
|
|
Regular |
| 09 |
0.0996 |
365 |
|
0.2880 |
|
|
Regular |
| 10 |
0.1779 |
365 |
|
0.2700 |
|
|
Regular |
| 11 |
0.0688 |
365 |
|
0.0900 |
|
|
Regular |
| 13 |
0.1773 |
365 |
|
0.1080 |
|
|
Regular |
| 14 |
0.1849 |
365 |
|
0.2988 |
|
|
Regular |
| 15 |
0.1582 |
365 |
|
0.1476 |
|
|
Regular |
| 16 |
0.1579 |
365 |
|
0.1786 |
|
|
Regular |
| 6 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
0.0000 |
|
2018 |
Regular |
Ground Water Sources (continued)
| Name or Number |
Well Depth (Feet) |
Casing Depth (Feet) |
Screen Depth (Feet) |
Well Diameter (Inches) |
Pump Intake Depth (Feet) |
Metered? |
| Top |
Bottom |
| 01 |
117 |
60 |
98 |
101 |
6 |
65 |
Yes |
| 02 |
113 |
65 |
57 |
87 |
8 |
65 |
Yes |
| 03 |
125 |
60 |
94 |
120 |
10 |
93 |
Yes |
| 04 |
140 |
80 |
94 |
119 |
10 |
95 |
Yes |
| 05 |
103 |
103 |
78 |
98 |
8 |
56 |
No |
| 07 |
94 |
28 |
56 |
66 |
6 |
56 |
Yes |
| 08 |
126 |
115 |
90 |
110 |
8 |
80 |
Yes |
| 09 |
117 |
112 |
97 |
107 |
8 |
47 |
Yes |
| 10 |
130 |
115 |
85 |
110 |
8 |
58 |
Yes |
| 11 |
126 |
111 |
50 |
65 |
8 |
63 |
Yes |
| 13 |
107 |
67 |
67 |
102 |
8 |
63 |
Yes |
| 14 |
121 |
96 |
96 |
116 |
8 |
92 |
Yes |
| 15 |
112 |
72 |
72 |
107 |
8 |
69 |
Yes |
| 16 |
115 |
70 |
70 |
110 |
8 |
67 |
Yes |
| 6 |
87 |
53 |
77 |
87 |
6 |
|
No |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Pasquotank County |
04-70-015 |
0.2509 |
365 |
|
|
No |
Yes |
8 |
Regular |
| Pasquotank R.O. System |
60-70-000 |
0.1416 |
365 |
|
|
No |
Yes |
24 |
Regular |
| South Camden Water & Sewer Dist. |
04-15-015 |
0.0000 |
0 |
|
|
No |
Yes |
6 |
Emergency |
Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| Elizabeth City WTP |
5.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Groundwater |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
2.8100 |
May |
2.9000 |
Sep |
2.8000 |
| Feb |
3.7200 |
Jun |
3.2800 |
Oct |
2.7800 |
| Mar |
3.6000 |
Jul |
3.5100 |
Nov |
3.2600 |
| Apr |
3.4700 |
Aug |
3.0200 |
Dec |
3.2000 |

Wastewater Permits
| Permit Number |
Type |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Design Capacity (MGD) |
Average Annual Daily Discharge (MGD) |
Maximum Day Discharge (MGD) |
Receiving Stream |
Receiving Basin |
| NC0025011 |
WWTP |
4.5000 |
4.5000 |
3.2000 |
7.1000 |
Pasquotank River |
Albemarle Sound (12-1) |
| NC0036447 |
WWTP |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Knobbs Creek |
Albemarle Sound (12-1) |
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
19,948 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.7674 |
0.7901 |
0.7920 |
0.7920 |
0.7920 |
0.7920 |
| Commercial |
0.6402 |
0.6797 |
0.6417 |
0.6400 |
0.6400 |
0.6400 |
| Industrial |
0.0088 |
0.0095 |
0.0063 |
0.0063 |
0.0063 |
0.0063 |
| Institutional |
0.0496 |
0.0534 |
0.0302 |
0.0302 |
0.0302 |
0.0302 |
| System Process |
0.3279 |
0.1280 |
0.1280 |
0.1280 |
0.1280 |
0.1280 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.7292 |
0.5520 |
0.5312 |
0.5307 |
0.5307 |
0.5307 |
During the winter of 25/26. Elizabeth city has experienced massive water loss due to ruptured lines throughout the system. Future Supply Sources
| Source Name |
PWSID |
Source Type |
Additional Supply |
Year Online |
Year Offline |
Type |
| Ground water |
04-70-010 |
Ground |
0.7800 |
2028 |
|
Regular |
City of Elizabeth city is currently working with Contractors, to locate test sites for new wells. Expect new well in the very near future. The City has long term expectations to add additional 7 well for a total of (8) new wells. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
2.6648 |
2.6648 |
2.6648 |
2.6648 |
2.6648 |
2.6648 |
| Purchases |
0.3925 |
0.3925 |
0.3925 |
0.3925 |
0.3925 |
0.3925 |
| Future Supplies |
0.7800 |
0.7800 |
0.7800 |
0.7800 |
0.7800 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
3.0573 |
3.8373 |
3.8373 |
3.8373 |
3.8373 |
3.8373 |
| Service Area Demand |
2.5231 |
2.2127 |
2.1294 |
2.1272 |
2.1272 |
2.1272 |
| Sales |
0.0016 |
0.0016 |
0.0016 |
0.0016 |
0.0016 |
0.0016 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
2.5247 |
2.2143 |
2.1310 |
2.1288 |
2.1288 |
2.1288 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
83% |
58% |
56% |
55% |
55% |
55% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 38 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
The City is actively moving to set 8 new wells. in the next few years. Progress has been extremely slow. Continue to work with Geologist, to assess
current capacities, and site locations for new wells.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? Request Moratorium on new construction, to slow down new construction. This needs to be done, to allow the infrastructure to catch up.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? Establishing 8 new wells.
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? Issuing of bonds to cover the cost of implementing new wells. .
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|