|
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Complete
| Water System Name: |
Carthage |
|
PWSID: |
03-63-025 |
| Mailing Address: | 4396 Hwy 15-501 Carthage, NC 28327 | Ownership: | Municipality |
| |
| Contact Person: | Emily Yopp | Title: | Town Manager |
| Phone: | 910-947-2331 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
| |
| Secondary Contact: | David McKew | | Phone: | 910-947-2701 |
| Mailing Address: | 400 Vass Carthage Road Carthage, NC 28327 | Cell/Mobile: | -- |
Distribution System
| Line Type |
Size Range (Inches) |
Estimated % of lines |
| Asbestos Cement |
6-12 |
10.00 % |
| Cast Iron |
6-8 |
20.00 % |
| Ductile Iron |
6-12 |
5.00 % |
| Galvanized Iron |
1.-2. |
4.00 % |
| Polyvinyl Chloride |
1-12 |
61.00 % |
Programs
Water Conservation
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
| Sub-Basin(s) | % of Service Population |
| Cape Fear River (02-3) | 100 % |
|
| County(s) | % of Service Population |
| Moore | 100 % |
|
Water Use by Type
| Type of Use |
Metered Connections |
Metered Average Use (MGD) |
Non-Metered Connections |
Non-Metered Estimated Use (MGD) |
| Residential |
1,432 |
0.2480 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Commercial |
221 |
0.0490 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Industrial |
0 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
4 |
0.0580 |
0 |
0.0000 |
How much water was used for system processes (backwash, line cleaning, flushing, etc.)? 0.0000 MGD
Water Sales
| Purchaser |
PWSID |
Average Daily Sold (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Southern Pines |
03-63-010 |
0.0000 |
0 |
0.0000 |
2060 |
Yes |
No |
8 |
Emergency |
3. Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Use (MGD) |
Max Day Use (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.3300 |
0.3850 |
May |
0.3820 |
0.4280 |
Sep |
0.3950 |
0.4630 |
| Feb |
0.3550 |
0.3850 |
Jun |
0.3740 |
0.4510 |
Oct |
0.3510 |
0.4070 |
| Mar |
0.3490 |
0.3850 |
Jul |
0.3770 |
0.4370 |
Nov |
0.2840 |
0.3870 |
| Apr |
0.3640 |
0.4250 |
Aug |
0.3770 |
0.4460 |
Dec |
0.2970 |
0.3990 |

Surface Water Sources
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Average Daily Withdrawal |
Maximum Day Withdrawal (MGD) |
Available Raw Water Supply |
Usable On-Stream Raw Water Supply Storage (MG) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
MGD |
* Qualifier |
| Nicks Creek |
Carthage Water Plant Reservoir |
0.3530 |
365 |
0.4630 |
1.0000 |
F |
1.0000 |
* Qualifier: C=Contract Amount, SY20=20-year Safe Yield, SY50=50-year Safe Yield, F=20% of 7Q10 or other instream flow requirement, CUA=Capacity Use Area Permit
Surface Water Sources (continued)
| Stream |
Reservoir |
Drainage Area (sq mi) |
Metered? |
Sub-Basin |
County |
Year Offline |
Use Type |
| Nicks Creek |
Carthage Water Plant Reservoir |
200 |
Yes |
Cape Fear River (02-3) |
Moore |
|
Regular |
Water Purchases From Other Systems
| Seller |
PWSID |
Average Daily Purchased (MGD) |
Days Used |
Contract |
Required to comply with water use restrictions? |
Pipe Size(s) (Inches) |
Use Type |
| MGD |
Expiration |
Recurring |
| Southern Pines |
03-63-010 |
0.0670 |
97 |
0.5000 |
2060 |
Yes |
Yes |
8 |
Regular |
Changed purchase contract from emergency to regular due to use greater than 30 days. Water Treatment Plants
| Plant Name |
Permitted Capacity (MGD) |
Is Raw Water Metered? |
Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? |
Source |
| Carthage Water Plant |
1.0000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Raw Water Reservoir / Nicks Creek |
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
|
Average Daily Discharge (MGD) |
| Jan |
0.2500 |
May |
0.2810 |
Sep |
0.3030 |
| Feb |
0.2360 |
Jun |
0.2850 |
Oct |
0.2240 |
| Mar |
0.2440 |
Jul |
0.2920 |
Nov |
0.2440 |
| Apr |
0.2710 |
Aug |
0.2970 |
Dec |
0.2270 |

Wastewater Interconnections
| Water System |
PWSID |
Type |
Average Daily Amount |
Contract Maximum (MGD) |
| MGD |
Days Used |
| Moore County |
03-63-025 |
Discharging |
0.2600 |
365 |
|
5. Planning
Projections
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Year-Round Population |
2,775 |
2,914 |
2,972 |
3,031 |
3,092 |
3,154 |
| Seasonal Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
| Residential |
0.2480 |
0.2600 |
0.2650 |
0.2700 |
0.2750 |
0.2800 |
| Commercial |
0.0490 |
0.0510 |
0.0520 |
0.0530 |
0.0540 |
0.0550 |
| Industrial |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Institutional |
0.0580 |
0.0570 |
0.0580 |
0.0590 |
0.0600 |
0.0610 |
| System Process |
0.0000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
| Unaccounted-for |
0.0158 |
0.0758 |
0.0766 |
0.0772 |
0.0779 |
0.0784 |
Adjusted unaccounted-for demand to 8% of total demand which is the historical median. Demand v/s Percent of Supply
| |
2025 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
2070 |
| Surface Water Supply |
1.0000 |
1.0000 |
1.0000 |
1.0000 |
1.0000 |
1.0000 |
| Ground Water Supply |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Purchases |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
0.5000 |
| Future Supplies |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Available Supply (MGD) |
1.5000 |
1.5000 |
1.5000 |
1.5000 |
1.5000 |
1.5000 |
| Service Area Demand |
0.3708 |
0.9438 |
0.9516 |
0.9592 |
0.9669 |
0.9744 |
| Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Future Sales |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
| Total Demand (MGD) |
0.3708 |
0.9438 |
0.9516 |
0.9592 |
0.9669 |
0.9744 |
| Demand as Percent of Supply |
25% |
63% |
63% |
64% |
64% |
65% |

The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time. The per capita water demand may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted. Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 89 gallons per capita per day. What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand (i.e. conduct regular water audits, implement a plumbing retrofit program, employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)? If these practices are covered elsewhere in your plan, indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources, any water system deficiencies or needed improvements (storage, treatment, etc.) or your ability to meet present and future water needs. Include both quantity and quality considerations, as well as financial, technical, managerial, permitting, and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) provides the data contained within this
Local Water Supply Plan (LWSP) as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data. Neither DWR, nor any other party
involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely
free of errors and omissions. Furthermore, data users are cautioned that
LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff. Subsequent
review may result in significant revision. Questions regarding the accuracy
or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system
and/or DWR.
|